From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Latest brk patchset
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:43:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49BC413B.5020104@zytor.com> (raw)
Hi guys,
I was reviewing the latest brk patchset, and I have a question:
Why is the brk merged into the .bss, instead of being left in its own
(nobits) segment:
.bss : AT(ADDR(.bss) - LOAD_OFFSET) {
__init_end = .;
__bss_start = .; /* BSS */
*(.bss.page_aligned)
*(.bss)
. = ALIGN(4);
__bss_stop = .;
. = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE);
__brk_base = . ;
. += 64 * 1024 ; /* 64k slop space */
*(.brk_reservation) /* areas brk users have reserved */
__brk_limit = . ;
_end = . ;
}
It really doesn't make much sense to me, and is more than a bit
confusing given the symbols.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next reply other threads:[~2009-03-14 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-14 23:43 H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2009-03-15 0:32 ` Latest brk patchset Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-15 0:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-15 6:09 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-15 6:29 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-15 20:38 ` [crash] " Ingo Molnar
2009-03-15 20:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-15 21:19 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-15 21:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-15 23:28 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-16 8:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-16 16:12 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-16 16:56 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-16 17:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-16 17:54 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-16 18:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-16 18:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-16 18:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-16 18:31 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-16 18:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-16 19:25 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-16 19:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-16 19:48 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-16 20:00 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-16 20:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-16 20:59 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-16 21:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-16 21:31 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-16 22:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-17 2:26 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-17 4:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-17 5:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-17 16:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-17 19:42 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-17 19:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-17 19:59 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-17 21:19 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-17 21:28 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-17 19:47 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-22 15:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-22 17:12 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-22 17:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-22 21:48 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-23 16:39 ` [tip:x86/setup] x86/dmi: fix dmi_alloc() section mismatches Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-15 1:37 ` Latest brk patchset H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-15 4:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-15 4:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-15 5:33 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-15 6:05 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-15 6:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-15 6:03 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49BC413B.5020104@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.