From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm-userspace: x86: Support for breakpoints in ROM code
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:51:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49BF72B6.4040907@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49BF7109.5000207@siemens.com>
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> This is not a hack (it shouldn't have been merged upstream otherwise):
> cpu_physical_memory_write_rom() takes system-wide physical addresses
> while kvm_patch_opcode_byte() works with per-CPU linear addresses.
>
From exec.c:
> /* virtual memory access for debug */
> int cpu_memory_rw_debug(CPUState *env, target_ulong addr,
> uint8_t *buf, int len, int is_write)
> {
> int l;
> target_phys_addr_t phys_addr;
> target_ulong page;
>
> while (len > 0) {
> page = addr & TARGET_PAGE_MASK;
> phys_addr = cpu_get_phys_page_debug(env, page);
> /* if no physical page mapped, return an error */
> if (phys_addr == -1)
> return -1;
> l = (page + TARGET_PAGE_SIZE) - addr;
> if (l > len)
> l = len;
> cpu_physical_memory_rw(phys_addr + (addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK),
> buf, l, is_write);
> len -= l;
> buf += l;
> addr += l;
> }
> return 0;
> }
I'm talking about replacing cpu_physical_memory_rw() with
cpu_physical_memory_write_rom() (for the write case). Is there a case
where the debugger should be prevented from writing into ROM? If so,
maybe cpu_memory_rw_debug_rom() for breakpoints?
We shouldn't juggle page descriptors in *kvm*.c.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-17 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-16 18:48 [PATCH] kvm-userspace: x86: Support for breakpoints in ROM code Jan Kiszka
2009-03-16 18:53 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-03-17 9:33 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-17 9:44 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-03-17 9:51 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-03-17 10:43 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49BF72B6.4040907@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.