From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC] net: release dst entry in dev_queue_xmit()
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:40:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49C380A6.4000904@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
One point of contention in high network loads is the dst_release() performed
when a transmited skb is freed. This is because NIC tx completion calls skb free
long after original call to dev_queue_xmit(skb).
CPU cache is cold and the atomic op in dst_release() stalls. On SMP, this is
quite visible if one CPU is 100% handling softirqs for a network device,
since dst_clone() is done by other cpus, involving cache line ping pongs.
I believe we can release dst in dev_queue_xmit(), while cpu cache is hot, since
caller of dev_queue_xmit() had to hold a reference on dst right before. This reduce
work to be done by softirq handler, and decrease cache misses.
I also believe only pktgen can call dev_queue_xmit() with skb which have
a skb->users != 1. But pkthen skbs have a NULL dst entry.
I added a WARN_ON_ONCE() to catch other cases, and not release skb->dst
if skb->users != 1
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index f112970..9e0fd01 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1852,6 +1852,20 @@ gso:
if (q->enqueue) {
spinlock_t *root_lock = qdisc_lock(q);
+ /*
+ * Release dst while its refcnt is hot in CPU cache, instead
+ * of waiting NIC tx completion
+ */
+ if (likely(skb->dst)) {
+ if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&skb->users) != 1)) {
+ int newrefcnt;
+
+ smp_mb__before_atomic_dec();
+ newrefcnt = atomic_dec_return(&skb->dst->__refcnt);
+ WARN_ON(newrefcnt < 0);
+ skb->dst = NULL;
+ }
+ }
spin_lock(root_lock);
if (unlikely(test_bit(__QDISC_STATE_DEACTIVATED, &q->state))) {
next reply other threads:[~2009-03-20 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-20 11:40 Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-03-20 14:10 ` [RFC] net: release dst entry in dev_queue_xmit() Neil Horman
2009-03-25 6:43 ` David Miller
2009-03-25 7:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-25 7:17 ` David Miller
2009-03-25 18:22 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-03-25 18:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-25 19:18 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-03-25 19:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-25 19:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-03-25 20:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-25 21:12 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-03-25 21:20 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-05-12 8:12 ` [PATCH] net: release dst entry in dev_hard_start_xmit() Eric Dumazet
2009-05-12 8:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-12 19:26 ` [PATCH, v2] " Eric Dumazet
2009-05-19 5:19 ` David Miller
2009-05-19 5:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-19 19:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-19 21:09 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-05-19 21:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-19 21:24 ` David Miller
2009-05-12 19:27 ` [PATCH] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-05-12 19:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-12 20:05 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-05-12 20:24 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-05-12 20:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-12 20:59 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49C380A6.4000904@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.