From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: release dst entry in dev_queue_xmit()
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:13:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49C9D99A.2040900@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090324.234354.43714160.davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller a écrit :
> From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:40:22 +0100
>
>> I believe we can release dst in dev_queue_xmit(), while cpu cache is
>> hot, since caller of dev_queue_xmit() had to hold a reference on dst
>> right before. This reduce work to be done by softirq handler, and
>> decrease cache misses.
>>
>
> This will break various packet schedulers and classifiers.
>
> Heck sch_sfq.c even uses skb->dst as part of it's flow hash
> function :-)
Well, as one of the hash perturbator, for other protocols than
IPV4 & IPV6...
default:
h = (unsigned long)skb->dst ^ skb->protocol;
h2 = (unsigned long)skb->sk;
}
return sfq_fold_hash(q, h, h2);
But teql indeed mandates dst in __teql_resolve()
Darn...
This dst freeing should be done very late then, in the NIC driver itself, just
before giving skb to hardware, or right before in dev_hard_start_xmit()
If done in dev_hard_start_xmit(), skb could be requeued (because of NETDEV_TX_BUSY).
Then if requeued, maybe at this time, dst being NULL is not a problem ?
Thanks a lot David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-25 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-20 11:40 [RFC] net: release dst entry in dev_queue_xmit() Eric Dumazet
2009-03-20 14:10 ` Neil Horman
2009-03-25 6:43 ` David Miller
2009-03-25 7:13 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-03-25 7:17 ` David Miller
2009-03-25 18:22 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-03-25 18:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-25 19:18 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-03-25 19:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-25 19:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-03-25 20:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-25 21:12 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-03-25 21:20 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-05-12 8:12 ` [PATCH] net: release dst entry in dev_hard_start_xmit() Eric Dumazet
2009-05-12 8:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-12 19:26 ` [PATCH, v2] " Eric Dumazet
2009-05-19 5:19 ` David Miller
2009-05-19 5:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-19 19:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-19 21:09 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-05-19 21:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-19 21:24 ` David Miller
2009-05-12 19:27 ` [PATCH] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-05-12 19:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-12 20:05 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-05-12 20:24 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-05-12 20:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-12 20:59 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49C9D99A.2040900@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.