Re: The most recent attempt to build 2.6.29-rc8

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>]

M A Young wrote:
> That's strange because it wasn't when I sent it. I wonder if it got 
> mangled in-transit.

It was an attachment, so it should have been resistant.  Though it also 
had a '\0' on the end for good measure.

>> Unfortunately this didn't help me; it still ended up making this 'm', 
>> which doesn't work.  The simple fix is, I think, to make this a 
>> "bool", so it gets built in.  Its not really big enough to bother with.
>
> I have been using XEN_XENBUS_FRONTEND=m on some of my kernels so it 
> didn't cause me a problem, though of course if any of the dependent 
> modules were "y" then that would indeed be incorrect. I did have an 
> alternate way of doing it that I could try. 

Hm.  I wonder if there's a bunch of symbol exports missing.  Or perhaps 
it's a secondary problem, like mkinitrd is not putting the right modules 
in place.

    J