From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
devicetree-discuss list <devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] powerpc: NAND: FSL UPM: document new bindings
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:35:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49CBAED4.8030802@grandegger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa686aa40903260904s67258fbbge3c87e06946c5f58@mail.gmail.com>
Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com> wrote:
>> Grant Likely wrote:
>>> Does using the reg property give the driver enough information to
>>> reliably program the MAR for NAND connections that use the address
>>> line chip select scheme? Related to that, should the binding include
>> In principle yes:
>>
>> if (i > 0)
>> offset[i] = resource[i].start - resource[0].start;
>
> Ewww. That's ugly.
Yep.
>>> a property that explicitly states that an address line chip select
>>> scheme is being used?
>> That's why I'm still in favor of:
>>
>> fsl,upm-multi-chip-offsets = <0x200 0x400>
>>
>> That would state that the address line chip select scheme is used with
>> the specified offsets. It also allows for a more elegant solution
>> (code-wise).
>
> Alright. Then at the very least the property name should reflect that
> address lines CS is used to reduce the chance of confusion with
> another multi-chip scheme. Something like
> fsl,upm-addr-line-cs-offsets maybe?
>
> Here is another thought. The binding is describing that address lines
> are used to activate CS lines. Offset for chip access purposes is
> derived from the address line, but it doesn't directly describe the
> hardware. The following may be a better description of the hardware.
>
> fsl,upm-addr-line-cs = <9 10>;
The TQM8548 hardware has some logic connected to the two address lines
allowing to select up to 4 chips with two address lines:
fsl,upm-addr-line-cs-offsets = <0x0 0x200 0x400 0x600>
That's the more general solution.
Wolfgang.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-26 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-25 10:08 [PATCH v3 0/4] NAND: Multi-chip support for FSL-UPM for TQM8548 modules Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-25 10:08 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-25 10:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] NAND: FSL-UPM: add multi chip support Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-25 10:08 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-25 10:08 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] NAND: FSL-UPM: Add wait flags to support board/chip specific delays Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-25 10:08 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-25 10:08 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] powerpc: NAND: FSL UPM: document new bindings Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-25 10:08 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-25 10:08 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] powerpc/85xx: TQM8548: Update DTS file for multi-chip support Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-25 10:08 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-25 15:11 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] powerpc: NAND: FSL UPM: document new bindings Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-25 15:11 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-25 17:48 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-25 17:48 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-25 20:48 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-26 5:09 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-26 5:09 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-26 7:42 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-26 7:42 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-26 14:27 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-26 14:27 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-26 14:27 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-26 15:33 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-26 15:33 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-26 16:04 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-26 16:04 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-26 16:04 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-26 16:35 ` Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]
2009-03-26 17:02 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-26 17:02 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-26 17:33 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-26 17:33 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-26 17:33 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-26 22:14 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-26 22:14 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-26 23:22 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-26 23:22 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-26 23:22 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-26 23:32 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-26 23:32 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-26 23:32 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-27 8:07 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-27 8:07 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-25 15:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] NAND: FSL-UPM: Add wait flags to support board/chip specific delays Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-25 10:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] NAND: FSL-UPM: add multi chip support Singh, Vimal
2009-03-25 10:43 ` Singh, Vimal
2009-03-25 10:57 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-25 10:57 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-25 13:31 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-25 13:31 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-25 13:32 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-25 13:32 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-25 13:32 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-25 13:43 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-03-25 17:26 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-25 17:26 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-25 17:26 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-25 14:57 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-25 15:25 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49CBAED4.8030802@grandegger.com \
--to=wg@grandegger.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.