From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] core ticks/timer code
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:07:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49CDCCC1.5050503@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200903272130.26825.vapier@gentoo.org>
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the Blackfin core tick/timer code has been around since the start of the
> original port, but i'm not sure it's entirely correct. some common code that
> uses timers seems to be misbehaving in that the timeout is pretty much
> immediate. makes me think that we've spent time on making udelay() work, but
> then just glossed over the rest.
>
> unfortunately, there doesnt seem to be any docs on what exactly these
> functions do so it's hard for me to verify/change any of it.
Yes, you are right. Some days ago I found that no proper documentation
for the ticks/timer related code is there, too.
From looking at the existing code for some ARM boards (OSK, DaVinci,
OMAP3) my idea of this code is:
> my understanding is that:
> - get_ticks - return some notion of "cpu ticks"
Yes. Returns the number of cpu ticks since power up. I.e. with 1000
ticks per second (CONFIG_SYS_HZ) the number of elapsed ms since power up.
> - get_tbclk - return number of "cpu ticks" that elapse in one second
Yes. Some implementations just return CONFIG_SYS_HZ which is supposed
to be 1000.
> - timer_init - setup a core timer
Some implementations do this in interrupt_init(), too.
> - get_timer(x) - not really sure what this is supposed to represent, or how
> "x" is used
This is similar to get_ticks(), i.e. returns the number of ticks since
power up. Parameter x is used as a base which is subtracted from
ticks. With x == 0 this function is the same as get_ticks(). If x != 0
the value returned is
number of ticks since power up - x
> - reset_timer - reset core timer to 0
Some implementations don't reset the timer (hw device) itself. They
just reset the timestamp counter (sw variable) which counts the ticks
since power up (i.e. that is returned by get_ticks()).
> - CONFIG_SYS_HZ - no idea how this relates to ticks/timer in U-Boot as in the
> Linux world, this is the core timer (scheduler) frequency (how many times to
> execute per second)
CONFIG_SYS_HZ is supposed to be 1000
Does this make sense?
Best regards
Dirk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-28 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-28 1:30 [U-Boot] core ticks/timer code Mike Frysinger
2009-03-28 7:07 ` Dirk Behme [this message]
2009-03-31 1:10 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-03-31 11:41 ` Scott McNutt
2009-03-31 15:48 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-03-31 21:25 ` Scott Wood
2009-03-31 21:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-02 12:38 ` Detlev Zundel
2009-04-02 13:09 ` Scott McNutt
2009-03-31 20:46 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-03-31 8:17 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-03-31 9:13 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-03-31 10:28 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-03-31 11:25 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-03-31 11:41 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-03-31 15:55 ` Dirk Behme
2009-04-02 19:16 ` Ladislav Michl
2009-04-02 21:18 ` Graeme Russ
2009-04-04 21:35 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-03-31 15:46 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-03-31 11:39 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-03-31 15:49 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-03-31 21:32 ` Scott Wood
2009-04-04 21:14 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-06 19:12 ` Scott Wood
2009-04-06 19:43 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-03-31 20:43 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49CDCCC1.5050503@googlemail.com \
--to=dirk.behme@googlemail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.