From: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers
<compudj-vdFpqfd5riKZ9vWoFJJngh2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Trond.Myklebust-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-embedded-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
ltt-dev-33AaDErTWvBVxDZ2/Zk0YoryAYyacSEB@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: add support for splice writes
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:12:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49D45E42.3050502@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090402063235.GB24846@Krystal>
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Suresh Jayaraman (sjayaraman-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org) wrote:
>> This patch attempts to add splice writes support. In essence, it just
>> calls generic_file_splice_write() after doing a little sanity check.
>> This would allow LTTng users that are using NFS to store trace data.
>> There could be more applications that could be benefitted too.
>>
>> I have tested this using the Jens' test program and have found no
>> real issues. The test program is inlined below:
>>
>
> There is just a small checkpatch nit that I'll fix directly in place in
> the LTTng tree.
>
> WARNING: %Ld/%Lu are not-standard C, use %lld/%llu
> #93: FILE: fs/nfs/file.c:564:
> + dprintk("NFS splice_write(%s/%s, %lu@%Lu)\n",
>
> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 42 lines checked
>
Yes, I noticed it. There are quite a few places in nfs code where we
happened to use that (that doesn't imply that it shouldn't be fixed), so
I thought it's OK.
> That's great ! I'll pull it in the LTTng tree so my users can try it.
> They currently cannot write LTTng traces to NFS mounts anyway.
Yes, please report the test results. Would appreciate it very much.
Thanks,
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/file.c b/fs/nfs/file.c
>> index 90f292b..13d6a00 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfs/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfs/file.c
>> @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ static ssize_t nfs_file_splice_read(struct file *filp, loff_t *ppos,
>> size_t count, unsigned int flags);
>> static ssize_t nfs_file_read(struct kiocb *, const struct iovec *iov,
>> unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t pos);
>> +static ssize_t nfs_file_splice_write(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
>> + struct file *filp, loff_t *ppos,
>> + size_t count, unsigned int flags);
>> static ssize_t nfs_file_write(struct kiocb *, const struct iovec *iov,
>> unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t pos);
>> static int nfs_file_flush(struct file *, fl_owner_t id);
>> @@ -76,6 +79,7 @@ const struct file_operations nfs_file_operations = {
>> .lock = nfs_lock,
>> .flock = nfs_flock,
>> .splice_read = nfs_file_splice_read,
>> + .splice_write = nfs_file_splice_write,
>> .check_flags = nfs_check_flags,
>> .setlease = nfs_setlease,
>> };
>> @@ -550,6 +554,26 @@ out_swapfile:
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> +static ssize_t nfs_file_splice_write(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
>> + struct file *filp, loff_t *ppos,
>> + size_t count, unsigned int flags)
>> +{
>> + struct dentry *dentry = filp->f_path.dentry;
>> + struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
>> +
>> + dprintk("NFS splice_write(%s/%s, %lu@%Lu)\n",
>> + dentry->d_parent->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.name,
>> + (unsigned long) count, (unsigned long long) *ppos);
>> +
>> + if (IS_SWAPFILE(inode)) {
>> + printk(KERN_INFO "NFS: attempt to write to active swap"
>> + "file!\n");
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return generic_file_splice_write(pipe, filp, ppos, count, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int do_getlk(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
>> {
>> struct inode *inode = filp->f_mapping->host;
>>
>
--
Suresh Jayaraman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers
<compudj-vdFpqfd5riKZ9vWoFJJngh2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ltt-dev-33AaDErTWvBVxDZ2/Zk0YoryAYyacSEB@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: add support for splice writes
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:12:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49D45E42.3050502@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090402063235.GB24846@Krystal>
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Suresh Jayaraman (sjayaraman@suse.de) wrote:
>> This patch attempts to add splice writes support. In essence, it just
>> calls generic_file_splice_write() after doing a little sanity check.
>> This would allow LTTng users that are using NFS to store trace data.
>> There could be more applications that could be benefitted too.
>>
>> I have tested this using the Jens' test program and have found no
>> real issues. The test program is inlined below:
>>
>
> There is just a small checkpatch nit that I'll fix directly in place in
> the LTTng tree.
>
> WARNING: %Ld/%Lu are not-standard C, use %lld/%llu
> #93: FILE: fs/nfs/file.c:564:
> + dprintk("NFS splice_write(%s/%s, %lu@%Lu)\n",
>
> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 42 lines checked
>
Yes, I noticed it. There are quite a few places in nfs code where we
happened to use that (that doesn't imply that it shouldn't be fixed), so
I thought it's OK.
> That's great ! I'll pull it in the LTTng tree so my users can try it.
> They currently cannot write LTTng traces to NFS mounts anyway.
Yes, please report the test results. Would appreciate it very much.
Thanks,
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/file.c b/fs/nfs/file.c
>> index 90f292b..13d6a00 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfs/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfs/file.c
>> @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ static ssize_t nfs_file_splice_read(struct file *filp, loff_t *ppos,
>> size_t count, unsigned int flags);
>> static ssize_t nfs_file_read(struct kiocb *, const struct iovec *iov,
>> unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t pos);
>> +static ssize_t nfs_file_splice_write(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
>> + struct file *filp, loff_t *ppos,
>> + size_t count, unsigned int flags);
>> static ssize_t nfs_file_write(struct kiocb *, const struct iovec *iov,
>> unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t pos);
>> static int nfs_file_flush(struct file *, fl_owner_t id);
>> @@ -76,6 +79,7 @@ const struct file_operations nfs_file_operations = {
>> .lock = nfs_lock,
>> .flock = nfs_flock,
>> .splice_read = nfs_file_splice_read,
>> + .splice_write = nfs_file_splice_write,
>> .check_flags = nfs_check_flags,
>> .setlease = nfs_setlease,
>> };
>> @@ -550,6 +554,26 @@ out_swapfile:
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> +static ssize_t nfs_file_splice_write(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
>> + struct file *filp, loff_t *ppos,
>> + size_t count, unsigned int flags)
>> +{
>> + struct dentry *dentry = filp->f_path.dentry;
>> + struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
>> +
>> + dprintk("NFS splice_write(%s/%s, %lu@%Lu)\n",
>> + dentry->d_parent->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.name,
>> + (unsigned long) count, (unsigned long long) *ppos);
>> +
>> + if (IS_SWAPFILE(inode)) {
>> + printk(KERN_INFO "NFS: attempt to write to active swap"
>> + "file!\n");
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return generic_file_splice_write(pipe, filp, ppos, count, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int do_getlk(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
>> {
>> struct inode *inode = filp->f_mapping->host;
>>
>
--
Suresh Jayaraman
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
Cc: Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: add support for splice writes
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:12:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49D45E42.3050502@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090402063235.GB24846@Krystal>
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Suresh Jayaraman (sjayaraman@suse.de) wrote:
>> This patch attempts to add splice writes support. In essence, it just
>> calls generic_file_splice_write() after doing a little sanity check.
>> This would allow LTTng users that are using NFS to store trace data.
>> There could be more applications that could be benefitted too.
>>
>> I have tested this using the Jens' test program and have found no
>> real issues. The test program is inlined below:
>>
>
> There is just a small checkpatch nit that I'll fix directly in place in
> the LTTng tree.
>
> WARNING: %Ld/%Lu are not-standard C, use %lld/%llu
> #93: FILE: fs/nfs/file.c:564:
> + dprintk("NFS splice_write(%s/%s, %lu@%Lu)\n",
>
> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 42 lines checked
>
Yes, I noticed it. There are quite a few places in nfs code where we
happened to use that (that doesn't imply that it shouldn't be fixed), so
I thought it's OK.
> That's great ! I'll pull it in the LTTng tree so my users can try it.
> They currently cannot write LTTng traces to NFS mounts anyway.
Yes, please report the test results. Would appreciate it very much.
Thanks,
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/file.c b/fs/nfs/file.c
>> index 90f292b..13d6a00 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfs/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfs/file.c
>> @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ static ssize_t nfs_file_splice_read(struct file *filp, loff_t *ppos,
>> size_t count, unsigned int flags);
>> static ssize_t nfs_file_read(struct kiocb *, const struct iovec *iov,
>> unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t pos);
>> +static ssize_t nfs_file_splice_write(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
>> + struct file *filp, loff_t *ppos,
>> + size_t count, unsigned int flags);
>> static ssize_t nfs_file_write(struct kiocb *, const struct iovec *iov,
>> unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t pos);
>> static int nfs_file_flush(struct file *, fl_owner_t id);
>> @@ -76,6 +79,7 @@ const struct file_operations nfs_file_operations = {
>> .lock = nfs_lock,
>> .flock = nfs_flock,
>> .splice_read = nfs_file_splice_read,
>> + .splice_write = nfs_file_splice_write,
>> .check_flags = nfs_check_flags,
>> .setlease = nfs_setlease,
>> };
>> @@ -550,6 +554,26 @@ out_swapfile:
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> +static ssize_t nfs_file_splice_write(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
>> + struct file *filp, loff_t *ppos,
>> + size_t count, unsigned int flags)
>> +{
>> + struct dentry *dentry = filp->f_path.dentry;
>> + struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
>> +
>> + dprintk("NFS splice_write(%s/%s, %lu@%Lu)\n",
>> + dentry->d_parent->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.name,
>> + (unsigned long) count, (unsigned long long) *ppos);
>> +
>> + if (IS_SWAPFILE(inode)) {
>> + printk(KERN_INFO "NFS: attempt to write to active swap"
>> + "file!\n");
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return generic_file_splice_write(pipe, filp, ppos, count, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int do_getlk(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
>> {
>> struct inode *inode = filp->f_mapping->host;
>>
>
--
Suresh Jayaraman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-02 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-02 6:21 [PATCH] nfs: add support for splice writes Suresh Jayaraman
2009-04-02 6:21 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2009-04-02 6:21 ` Suresh Jayaraman
[not found] ` <49D45974.2060202-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-02 6:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-02 6:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-02 6:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-02 6:32 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-02 6:32 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-02 6:32 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-02 6:42 ` Suresh Jayaraman [this message]
2009-04-02 6:42 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2009-04-02 6:42 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2009-04-02 12:42 ` [ltt-dev] " Masahiro Tamori
2009-04-20 5:39 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2009-04-20 12:23 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1240230224.8073.6.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-20 12:38 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2009-04-20 12:38 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2009-04-20 12:38 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2009-04-20 14:21 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-04-20 15:47 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2009-04-21 14:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20090421144810.GA7036-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-21 17:35 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-04-21 17:35 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-04-21 17:35 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1240335302.5390.20.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-21 18:48 ` Chuck Lever
2009-04-21 18:48 ` Chuck Lever
2009-04-21 18:48 ` Chuck Lever
2009-04-22 8:33 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2009-04-22 8:33 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2009-04-22 8:33 ` Suresh Jayaraman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49D45E42.3050502@suse.de \
--to=sjayaraman-l3a5bk7wagm@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=compudj-vdFpqfd5riKZ9vWoFJJngh2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-embedded-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ltt-dev-33AaDErTWvBVxDZ2/Zk0YoryAYyacSEB@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.