* TCP TSecr question
@ 2009-04-10 16:24 Cosmin Ratiu
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Cosmin Ratiu @ 2009-04-10 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Hello,
There is an issue with this field in SYN packets when tw reuse/recycle
is on.
Quoting from RFC 1323, section 3.2:
The Timestamp Echo Reply field (TSecr) is only valid if the ACK
bit is set in the TCP header; if it is valid, it echos a times-
tamp value that was sent by the remote TCP in the TSval field
of a Timestamps option. When TSecr is not valid, its value
must be zero. The TSecr value will generally be from the most
recent Timestamp option that was received; however, there are
exceptions that are explained below.
On Linux, when the sysctl_tcp_tw_reuse or recycle is on, the most recent
timestamp from a previous connection is sent instead of 0. From what I've
seen in the source, this has to do with PAWS against delayed/duplicate SYN
packets.
My questions:
1) Is this violation of RFC 1323 useful in PAWS or did I misunderstand
the whole situation?
2) Is there any other RFC that amends 1323 to specify this behavior or is it
a Linux-specific enhancement?
Thank you,
Cosmin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2009-04-10 16:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-10 16:24 TCP TSecr question Cosmin Ratiu
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.