From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Szabolcs Szakacsits <szaka@ntfs-3g.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Grant Grundler <grundler@google.com>,
Linux IDE mailing list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Implementing NVMHCI...
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 19:15:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E213AE.4060506@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090412162018.6c1507b4@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Alan Cox wrote:
>> The atomic building units (sector size, block size, etc) of NTFS are
>> entirely parametric. The maximum values could be bigger than the
>> currently "configured" maximum limits.
>>
>
> That isn't what bites you - you can run 8K-32K ext2 file systems but if
> your physical page size is smaller than the fs page size you have a
> problem.
>
> The question is whether the NT VM can cope rather than the fs.
>
A quick test shows that it can. I didn't try mmap(), but copying files
around worked.
Did you expect it not to work?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-12 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20090412091228.GA29937@elte.hu>
2009-04-12 15:14 ` Implementing NVMHCI Szabolcs Szakacsits
2009-04-12 15:20 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-12 16:15 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-04-12 17:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-13 6:32 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-13 15:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-13 15:38 ` James Bottomley
2009-04-14 7:22 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-14 10:07 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-14 9:59 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-14 10:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-14 10:37 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-14 11:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-14 11:58 ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2009-04-17 22:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-04-14 12:08 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-14 12:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-25 8:26 ` Pavel Machek
2009-04-12 15:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-12 17:02 ` Robert Hancock
2009-04-12 17:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-12 18:35 ` Robert Hancock
2009-04-13 11:18 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-12 17:23 ` James Bottomley
[not found] ` <6934efce0904141052j3d4f87cey9fc4b802303aa73b@mail.gmail.com>
2009-04-15 6:37 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-04-30 22:51 ` Jörn Engel
2009-04-30 23:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-11 17:33 Jeff Garzik
2009-04-11 19:32 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-11 19:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-11 20:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-11 21:49 ` Grant Grundler
2009-04-11 22:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-12 5:08 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-04-11 23:25 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-11 23:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-12 0:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-12 1:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-12 1:15 ` david
2009-04-12 3:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-12 14:23 ` Mark Lord
2009-04-12 17:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-11 19:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-11 21:08 ` John Stoffel
2009-04-11 21:31 ` John Stoffel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49E213AE.4060506@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=grundler@google.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=szaka@ntfs-3g.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.