From: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@nortel.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: how to tell if arbitrary kernel memory address is backed by physical memory?
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:15:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E8AB11.4000708@nortel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0904161654480.7855@qirst.com>
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Chris Friesen wrote:
>> Is there a portable way to tell whether a particular virtual address in the
>> lowmem address range is backed by physical memory and is readable?
>>
>> For background...we have some guys working on a software memory scrubber for
>> an embedded board. The memory controller supports ECC but doesn't support
>> scrubbing in hardware. What we want to do is walk all of lowmem, reading in
>> memory. If a fault is encountered, it will be handled by other code.
>
> Virtual address in the lowmem address range? lowmem address ranges exist
> for physical addresses.
>
> If you walk lowmem (physical) then you will never see a missing page.
We have a mips board that appears to have holes in the lowmem mappings
such that blindly walking all of it causes problems. I assume the
allocator knows about these holes and simply doesn't assign memory at
those addresses.
We may have found a solution though...it looks like virt_addr_valid()
returns false for the problematic addresses. Would it be reasonable to
call this once for each page before trying to access it?
Chris
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@nortel.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: how to tell if arbitrary kernel memory address is backed by physical memory?
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:15:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E8AB11.4000708@nortel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0904161654480.7855@qirst.com>
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Chris Friesen wrote:
>> Is there a portable way to tell whether a particular virtual address in the
>> lowmem address range is backed by physical memory and is readable?
>>
>> For background...we have some guys working on a software memory scrubber for
>> an embedded board. The memory controller supports ECC but doesn't support
>> scrubbing in hardware. What we want to do is walk all of lowmem, reading in
>> memory. If a fault is encountered, it will be handled by other code.
>
> Virtual address in the lowmem address range? lowmem address ranges exist
> for physical addresses.
>
> If you walk lowmem (physical) then you will never see a missing page.
We have a mips board that appears to have holes in the lowmem mappings
such that blindly walking all of it causes problems. I assume the
allocator knows about these holes and simply doesn't assign memory at
those addresses.
We may have found a solution though...it looks like virt_addr_valid()
returns false for the problematic addresses. Would it be reasonable to
call this once for each page before trying to access it?
Chris
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-17 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-16 15:37 how to tell if arbitrary kernel memory address is backed by physical memory? Chris Friesen
2009-04-16 15:37 ` Chris Friesen
2009-04-16 20:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-16 20:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-17 16:15 ` Chris Friesen [this message]
2009-04-17 16:15 ` Chris Friesen
2009-04-17 16:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-17 16:27 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49E8AB11.4000708@nortel.com \
--to=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.