From: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: 85xx: Add PHY fixup to socrates board code
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:24:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49EE55A4.4000602@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <625ED025-8D5B-437F-BEA8-1A599B677D43@kernel.crashing.org>
Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Apr 21, 2009, at 4:54 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 21, 2009, at 12:19 PM, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
>>
>>> If the firmware missed to initialize the PHY correctly,
>>> Linux may hang up on socrates while eth0/eth1 interface
>>> startup (caused by continuous unacknowledged PHY interrupt).
>>>
>>> This patch adds PHY fixup to socrates platform code to
>>> ensure the PHY is pre-initialized correctly. It is needed
>>> to be compatible with older firmware.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
>>> ---
>>> Changes since first version:
>>> use macros instead of register numbers as
>>> suggested by Anton
>>>
>>> Kumar, could you please consider this patch for
>>> inclusion into 2.6.30? Thanks!
>>
>> Sorry. I dont think this is board specific and should at a minimum be
>> done in m88e1011_config_init in drivers/net/phy/marvell.c. Not sure
>> how 88E1011 differs from 88E1111, but I'm wondering if you really want
>> to set config_init for m88e1011 to m88e1111_config_init
>>
>> - k
>
> I got confused by the #'s.. I think we should have a struct in marvell.c
> for m88e1121 which I'm guessing is the PHY you are using.
yes, m88e1121 is correct. In 2.6.30-rc2 there is already a m88e1121
struct in marvell_drivers[] in drivers/net/phy/marvell.c.
The reason I'm not doing the m88e1121 pre-init stuff in config_init
is as follows:
m88e1121 is a multi-PHY device with two PHY ports and each port
could signal an interrupt. This PHY device can be pin-strapped to use
shared interrupt pin for both PHY ports (as used on socrates board).
PHY specific config_init will be called e.g. while eth0 startup in
phy_attach() which is called from phy_connect() in drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c.
phy_connect() then calls phy_start_interrupts() which registers the
interrupt handler and enables the interrupts for the PHY-port config_init
is called for. Now interrupts can be cleared/acknowledged for this
PHY-port (eth0 interface), but interrupts from the another PHY-port
can not be acknowledged as eth1 was not brought up yet.
Placing this fixup in drivers/net/phy/marvell.c as in config_init callback
could be done, but this will add more overhead as the fixup routine have
to do more work:
acquire 'struct mii_bus' pointer and walk through all registered PHYs
searching for the PHY which use the same interrupt, then getting
the address of this PHY on the bus and disable and clear PHY irqs
by writing/reading to/from this PHY, (but only in the case it was
not already brought up and has interrupts enabled!) e.g.:
struct mii_bus *bus = phydev->bus;
int addr;
for (addr = 0; addr < PHY_MAX_ADDR; addr++) {
struct phy_device *phy = bus->phy_map[addr];
if (addr != phydev->addr && bus->irq[addr] == phydev->irq &&
(phy->phy_id & 0x0ffffff0) == 0x01410cb0 &&
!(phy->interrupts & PHY_INTERRUPT_ENABLED)) {
int imask = phy_read(phy, MII_M1011_IMASK);
if (imask) {
phy_write(phy, 0x12, 0); /* disable */
phy_read(phy, 0x13); /* clear */
}
}
}
All this to allow support for multiple m88e1121 devices.
Otherwise, after registering first phy interrupt handler
and enabling interrupt pending irq on other PHY port or
other PHY device will lock up the board.
The fixup in this patch will only be done while mdio bus scan
before registering a PHY device.
Anatolij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-21 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-07 14:19 [PATCH] powerpc: 85xx: Add PHY fixup to socrates board code Anatolij Gustschin
2009-04-07 14:30 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-04-07 17:24 ` Anatolij Gustschin
2009-04-07 18:09 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-04-07 18:40 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-04-21 17:19 ` [PATCH v2] " Anatolij Gustschin
2009-04-21 21:54 ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-21 22:04 ` Kumar Gala
2009-04-21 23:24 ` Anatolij Gustschin [this message]
2009-06-16 13:46 ` Kumar Gala
2009-06-23 10:15 ` Anatolij Gustschin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49EE55A4.4000602@denx.de \
--to=agust@denx.de \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.