Re: OT: Intel-Matrix for VT-capability?

[Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>]

Marc Bevand wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd <at> arndb.de> writes:
>   
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Core_2_microprocessors is quite
>> good here. As a rule of thumb, anything higher than 6000 will have VT,
>> anything below 6000 will not. Interesting exceptions are
>>
>> Doesn't have VT: E7300, Q8200, Q8400, E8190
>> Does have VT: T5600, U2xxx, SU3xxx, Celeron 900 (?)
>> May have VT[1]: T5500, Q8300, E7400, E7500, E5300, E5400
>>
>> Interestingly, when you look at the price list, you will see that
>> *all* processors that are not being obviously phased out (i.e. have
>> the same or higher price as a superior model) and carry a
>> Pentium or Core 2 name come with VT enabled.
>>     
>
> This is very wrong:
> - none of the Pentium, Celeron, Atom processors, even the latest ones,
>   come with VT
>   

According to processorfinder, 3 out of the 8 Atoms come with VT.  Some 
Pentium Ds also do.  Maybe some Celerons.

> - none of the Core 2 Duo E7xxx and Core 2 Quad Q8xxx support VT
>   

Most Core 2s do support VT.

> Be very careful into what you buy, check processorfinder.intel.com.
>
> Interestingly I found out that Intel will enable VT on a very small
> number of Core 2 and Pentium processors on June 12:
>   

That's in addition to currently supported processors.

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.