All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Bevand <m.bevand@gmail.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OT: Intel-Matrix for VT-capability?
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 05:02:51 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20090426T045647-1@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 49F19228.1080201@web.de

Oliver Rath <rath68 <at> web.de> writes:
> 
> Im looking for an abillity seeing vt-capability of Intel-processors by
> there name :-/
>
> I.e. T7200 has vt, T3400 has not. Exists a rule for the naming scheme
> seeing vt-capability? Alternatively, exists a matrix anywhere in the net
> for this?

Browse http://processorfinder.intel.com - Intel VT is reflected by the 
presence of "Intel® Virtualization Technology" in the supported feature list.

T7200: http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL9SL
T3400: http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SLB3P

> Im tired searching for vt-capability for every new OEM-intel-processor.
> On intel-site _did_ exist a pdf-table (not all processors, but most of
> T-series), but it seems to be removed.

You are probably talking about the price list PDF file at 
http://www.intc.com/priceList.cfm

I too am very annoyed that so many entry-level and medium-level Intel 
processors don't seem to support Intel VT. For example the less expensive one 
supporting VT is the Core 2 Duo E8400 at $163. Whereas in the case of AMD even 
their cheap $40 processors support AMD-V.

-marc


  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-26  5:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-24 10:19 OT: Intel-Matrix for VT-capability? Oliver Rath
2009-04-26  5:02 ` Marc Bevand [this message]
2009-04-26 22:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-04-28  1:35   ` Marc Bevand
2009-04-28 13:07     ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-28 15:08       ` Marc Bevand
2009-04-28 13:54     ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=loom.20090426T045647-1@post.gmane.org \
    --to=m.bevand@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.