From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: petkovbb@gmail.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org,
linux-ide@vger.
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] block: add rq->resid_len
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:25:42 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F96E96.5040107@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090430073719.GA9640@liondog.tnic>
Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> And I like it too, we've been coming up with all sorts of hacks in
>>> ide-atapi wrt to residual completion and accounting of what got xferred
>>> already and rq->resid_len is much more cleaner, IMHO.
>>>
>>> /me testing...
>> AFAICT, residual count handling in ide was most broken.
Oooh... It was "mostly broken" not "most broken". Where went my l and
y?
> Tell me about it :).
>
>> This patch doesn't fix anything other than making it report 0
>> resid_len on SG_IO which is usually better than reporting full
>> residual count. The only place inside ide where residual count is used
>> in the tape driver to determine actually transferred size. That part
>> works okay with the patch applied.
>
>> Hmmm... maybe it's about time to finally clean up residual count
>> handling in ide and libata, which BTW doesn't do anything about it at
>> the moment.
>
> Completely agreed. This doesn't do anything about it right now but
> with rq->resid_len in place I could get rid of a bunch of pc->xferred,
> cmd->nleft and similar on-stack structs we've been introducing, and use
> solely an rq in the LLD. I'll get to do some experimenting tomorrow and
> whip up some cleanup patches in order to see how it could look exactly.
> Stay tuned.
Yay, cool. :-)
--
tejun
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: petkovbb@gmail.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
bzolnier@gmail.com, petkovbb@googlemail.com,
sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com, mike.miller@hp.com,
chirag.kantharia@hp.com, Eric.Moore@lsi.com,
stern@rowland.harvard.edu, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp,
zaitcev@redhat.com, Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com,
sfr@canb.auug.org.au, grant.likely@secretlab.ca,
paul.clements@steeleye.com, jesper.juhl@gmail.com,
tim@cyberelk.net, jeremy@xensource.com, adrian@mcmen.demon.co.uk,
oakad@yahoo.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
ballabio_dario@emc.com, davem@davemloft.net,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, Markus.Lidel@shadowconnect.com,
bharrosh@panasas.com, Doug Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] block: add rq->resid_len
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:25:42 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F96E96.5040107@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090430073719.GA9640@liondog.tnic>
Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> And I like it too, we've been coming up with all sorts of hacks in
>>> ide-atapi wrt to residual completion and accounting of what got xferred
>>> already and rq->resid_len is much more cleaner, IMHO.
>>>
>>> /me testing...
>> AFAICT, residual count handling in ide was most broken.
Oooh... It was "mostly broken" not "most broken". Where went my l and
y?
> Tell me about it :).
>
>> This patch doesn't fix anything other than making it report 0
>> resid_len on SG_IO which is usually better than reporting full
>> residual count. The only place inside ide where residual count is used
>> in the tape driver to determine actually transferred size. That part
>> works okay with the patch applied.
>
>> Hmmm... maybe it's about time to finally clean up residual count
>> handling in ide and libata, which BTW doesn't do anything about it at
>> the moment.
>
> Completely agreed. This doesn't do anything about it right now but
> with rq->resid_len in place I could get rid of a bunch of pc->xferred,
> cmd->nleft and similar on-stack structs we've been introducing, and use
> solely an rq in the LLD. I'll get to do some experimenting tomorrow and
> whip up some cleanup patches in order to see how it could look exactly.
> Stay tuned.
Yay, cool. :-)
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-30 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-29 9:13 [GIT PATCH] block,scsi,ide: unify sector and data_len Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 01/10] nbd: don't clear rq->sector and nr_sectors unnecessarily Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 02/10] ide-tape: don't initialize rq->sector for rw requests Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 6:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 03/10] block: add rq->resid_len Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 14:41 ` James Bottomley
2009-04-30 1:59 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 6:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-04-30 7:19 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 7:19 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 7:19 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 7:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-04-30 9:25 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-04-30 9:25 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 9:25 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 04/10] block: implement blk_rq_pos/[cur_]sectors() and convert obvious ones Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-04-29 9:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-04-29 10:16 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 14:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-29 14:49 ` Grant Likely
2009-04-29 14:49 ` Grant Likely
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: convert to pos and nr_sectors accessors Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-04-29 9:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-04-29 10:19 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 14:48 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <1241037446.4516.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2009-04-30 17:30 ` Adrian McMenamin
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 06/10] ide: convert to rq " Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 07/10] block: drop request->hard_* and *nr_sectors Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 13:46 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-04 5:06 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 08/10] block: cleanup rq->data_len usages Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 13:47 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-04-30 15:35 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-01 18:27 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-03 1:32 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-03 13:51 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-04 4:19 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-03 1:36 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 09/10] ide: " Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 10/10] block: hide request sector and data_len Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 16:07 ` [GIT PATCH] block,scsi,ide: unify " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-01 18:29 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-03 2:50 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49F96E96.5040107@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger. \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=petkovbb@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.