From: ib@wupperonline.de (Ingo Brueckl)
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] unnecessary SCSI module
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:00:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49b60f4c@wupperonline.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1236633029.6029.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> writes:
>> When configuring MODULES with the kernel to be able to load external
>> drivers coming as modules, but not using anything as module in the kernel
>> itself, one would expect to end up in a module-free kernel. Currently, you
>> don't if you use SCSI. You'll get one unnecessary module.
> This isn't right because SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC only sets the *default*
> behaviour of the kernel. Even if it's n the user can still boot up with
> async scans by setting the kernel parameter.
Ok, understood. But has it to be a module then? Why not giving the choice
between building it directly into the kernel or as a module?
> It also keeps coming up regularly:
Well, then something doesn't seem to be ok, does it? ;-)
Ingo
Signed-off-by: Ingo Brueckl <ib@wupperonline.de>
--- linux-2.6.28/drivers/scsi/Kconfig.orig 2008-12-25 00:26:37.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.28/drivers/scsi/Kconfig 2009-03-10 08:11:38.000000000 +0100
@@ -257,10 +257,14 @@ config SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC
or async on the kernel's command line.
config SCSI_WAIT_SCAN
- tristate
- default m
+ tristate "SCSI wait scanning"
depends on SCSI
depends on MODULES
+ help
+ If you are using a SCSI module and do asynchronous SCSI scanning
+ (either by having selected SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC or by specifying
+ "scsi_mod.scan=async" on the kernel's command line), you MUST say Y
+ here.
menu "SCSI Transports"
depends on SCSI
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ib@wupperonline.de (Ingo Brueckl)
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] unnecessary SCSI module
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:00:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49b60f4c@wupperonline.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1236633029.6029.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> writes:
>> When configuring MODULES with the kernel to be able to load external
>> drivers coming as modules, but not using anything as module in the kernel
>> itself, one would expect to end up in a module-free kernel. Currently, you
>> don't if you use SCSI. You'll get one unnecessary module.
> This isn't right because SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC only sets the *default*
> behaviour of the kernel. Even if it's n the user can still boot up with
> async scans by setting the kernel parameter.
Ok, understood. But has it to be a module then? Why not giving the choice
between building it directly into the kernel or as a module?
> It also keeps coming up regularly:
Well, then something doesn't seem to be ok, does it? ;-)
Ingo
Signed-off-by: Ingo Brueckl <ib@wupperonline.de>
--- linux-2.6.28/drivers/scsi/Kconfig.orig 2008-12-25 00:26:37.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.28/drivers/scsi/Kconfig 2009-03-10 08:11:38.000000000 +0100
@@ -257,10 +257,14 @@ config SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC
or async on the kernel's command line.
config SCSI_WAIT_SCAN
- tristate
- default m
+ tristate "SCSI wait scanning"
depends on SCSI
depends on MODULES
+ help
+ If you are using a SCSI module and do asynchronous SCSI scanning
+ (either by having selected SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC or by specifying
+ "scsi_mod.scan=async" on the kernel's command line), you MUST say Y
+ here.
menu "SCSI Transports"
depends on SCSI
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-10 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-09 19:06 [PATCH] unnecessary SCSI module Ingo Brueckl
2009-03-09 19:06 ` Ingo Brueckl
2009-03-09 21:10 ` James Bottomley
2009-03-10 7:00 ` Ingo Brueckl [this message]
2009-03-10 7:00 ` Ingo Brueckl
2009-03-10 14:46 ` James Bottomley
2009-03-10 17:24 ` Stefan Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49b60f4c@wupperonline.de \
--to=ib@wupperonline.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.