From: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@nxp.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>, Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
Camelia Groza <camelia.groza@nxp.com>,
Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND2 PATCH net v4 2/2] soc: fsl: qbman: Use raw spinlock for cgr_lock
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 12:26:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49ca7920-d429-434a-aede-1a200e8d5ce8@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <63ab7b62-853c-4996-a493-465283252d5a@csgroup.eu>
On 3/5/24 17:18, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 05/03/2024 à 19:14, Sean Anderson a écrit :
>> [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de sean.anderson@linux.dev. Découvrez pourquoi ceci est important à https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2/23/24 11:02, Sean Anderson wrote:
>>> On 2/23/24 00:38, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>>> Le 22/02/2024 à 18:07, Sean Anderson a écrit :
>>>>> [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de sean.anderson@linux.dev. Découvrez pourquoi ceci est important à https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>>>>
>>>>> cgr_lock may be locked with interrupts already disabled by
>>>>> smp_call_function_single. As such, we must use a raw spinlock to avoid
>>>>> problems on PREEMPT_RT kernels. Although this bug has existed for a
>>>>> while, it was not apparent until commit ef2a8d5478b9 ("net: dpaa: Adjust
>>>>> queue depth on rate change") which invokes smp_call_function_single via
>>>>> qman_update_cgr_safe every time a link goes up or down.
>>>>
>>>> Why a raw spinlock to avoid problems on PREEMPT_RT, can you elaborate ?
>>>
>>> smp_call_function always runs its callback in hard IRQ context, even on
>>> PREEMPT_RT, where spinlocks can sleep. So we need to use raw spinlocks
>>> to ensure we aren't waiting on a sleeping task. See the first bug report
>>> for more discussion.
>>>
>>> In the longer term it would be better to switch to some other
>>> abstraction.
>>
>> Does this make sense to you?
>
> Yes that fine, thanks for the clarification. Maybe you can explain that
> in the patch description in case you send a v5.
Hm, I thought I put this description in the commit message already.
Maybe something like
| smp_call_function always runs its callback in hard IRQ context, even on
| PREEMPT_RT, where spinlocks can sleep. So we need to use a raw spinlock
| for cgr_lock to ensure we aren't waiting on a sleeping task.
|
| Although this bug has existed for a while, it was not apparent until
| commit ef2a8d5478b9 ("net: dpaa: Adjust queue depth on rate change")
| which invokes smp_call_function_single via qman_update_cgr_safe every
| time a link goes up or down.
would be clearer.
--Sean
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@nxp.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>, Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
Camelia Groza <camelia.groza@nxp.com>,
Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND2 PATCH net v4 2/2] soc: fsl: qbman: Use raw spinlock for cgr_lock
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 12:26:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49ca7920-d429-434a-aede-1a200e8d5ce8@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <63ab7b62-853c-4996-a493-465283252d5a@csgroup.eu>
On 3/5/24 17:18, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 05/03/2024 à 19:14, Sean Anderson a écrit :
>> [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de sean.anderson@linux.dev. Découvrez pourquoi ceci est important à https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2/23/24 11:02, Sean Anderson wrote:
>>> On 2/23/24 00:38, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>>> Le 22/02/2024 à 18:07, Sean Anderson a écrit :
>>>>> [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de sean.anderson@linux.dev. Découvrez pourquoi ceci est important à https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>>>>
>>>>> cgr_lock may be locked with interrupts already disabled by
>>>>> smp_call_function_single. As such, we must use a raw spinlock to avoid
>>>>> problems on PREEMPT_RT kernels. Although this bug has existed for a
>>>>> while, it was not apparent until commit ef2a8d5478b9 ("net: dpaa: Adjust
>>>>> queue depth on rate change") which invokes smp_call_function_single via
>>>>> qman_update_cgr_safe every time a link goes up or down.
>>>>
>>>> Why a raw spinlock to avoid problems on PREEMPT_RT, can you elaborate ?
>>>
>>> smp_call_function always runs its callback in hard IRQ context, even on
>>> PREEMPT_RT, where spinlocks can sleep. So we need to use raw spinlocks
>>> to ensure we aren't waiting on a sleeping task. See the first bug report
>>> for more discussion.
>>>
>>> In the longer term it would be better to switch to some other
>>> abstraction.
>>
>> Does this make sense to you?
>
> Yes that fine, thanks for the clarification. Maybe you can explain that
> in the patch description in case you send a v5.
Hm, I thought I put this description in the commit message already.
Maybe something like
| smp_call_function always runs its callback in hard IRQ context, even on
| PREEMPT_RT, where spinlocks can sleep. So we need to use a raw spinlock
| for cgr_lock to ensure we aren't waiting on a sleeping task.
|
| Although this bug has existed for a while, it was not apparent until
| commit ef2a8d5478b9 ("net: dpaa: Adjust queue depth on rate change")
| which invokes smp_call_function_single via qman_update_cgr_safe every
| time a link goes up or down.
would be clearer.
--Sean
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-07 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-22 17:07 [RESEND2 PATCH net v4 1/2] soc: fsl: qbman: Always disable interrupts when taking cgr_lock Sean Anderson
2024-02-22 17:07 ` Sean Anderson
2024-02-22 17:07 ` Sean Anderson
2024-02-22 17:07 ` [RESEND2 PATCH net v4 2/2] soc: fsl: qbman: Use raw spinlock for cgr_lock Sean Anderson
2024-02-22 17:07 ` Sean Anderson
2024-02-22 17:07 ` Sean Anderson
2024-02-23 5:38 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-02-23 5:38 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-02-23 16:02 ` Sean Anderson
2024-02-23 16:02 ` Sean Anderson
2024-03-05 18:14 ` Sean Anderson
2024-03-05 18:14 ` Sean Anderson
2024-03-05 22:18 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-05 22:18 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-07 17:26 ` Sean Anderson [this message]
2024-03-07 17:26 ` Sean Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49ca7920-d429-434a-aede-1a200e8d5ce8@linux.dev \
--to=sean.anderson@linux.dev \
--cc=camelia.groza@nxp.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oss@buserror.net \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=roy.pledge@nxp.com \
--cc=s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.