All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Karl Hiramoto <karl@hiramoto.org>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 12:02:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A02B1CA.3060708@hiramoto.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43e72e890905070104u59eebcceu18718a733e388cc9@mail.gmail.com>

Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> For those not subscribed to the ath9k wiki on wireless.kernel.org [1]
> (which we recommend you do if you're a user) here's a quick note to
> let you know our latest kernel recommendations for using ath9k:
>
>   *  >= 2.6.27.22
>   *  >= 2.6.28.10
>   *  2.6.29
>
> If you want 802.11n support or AP support you'll want at least 2.6.29.
> If you happen to have one of our new 1x1 AR9285 devices (all AR9285
> devices are 1x1) then you'll need at least 2.6.29. If you want to
> start using ath9k on APs with AHB you will need at least 2.6.30 (still
> in RC series).
>
> As usual if you happen to be stuck on older kernels for one reason or
> another you can always use compat-wireless [2] and if that happens to
> be a little too bleeding edge we have now compat-wireless releases for
> stable kernel releases, starting as of the 2.6.30-rc series [3].
>
>   Luis
>
> [1] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k
> [2] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download
> [3] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable
>   
Thanks for the update.  If i want to use multiple AP's with Ath9k it it 
still best to use wireless-testing?  Is multiple AP support in 2.6.30-rc 
series net-next or wireless-next?

Thanks.
--
Karl

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Karl Hiramoto <karl@hiramoto.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 12:02:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A02B1CA.3060708@hiramoto.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43e72e890905070104u59eebcceu18718a733e388cc9@mail.gmail.com>

Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> For those not subscribed to the ath9k wiki on wireless.kernel.org [1]
> (which we recommend you do if you're a user) here's a quick note to
> let you know our latest kernel recommendations for using ath9k:
>
>   *  >= 2.6.27.22
>   *  >= 2.6.28.10
>   *  2.6.29
>
> If you want 802.11n support or AP support you'll want at least 2.6.29.
> If you happen to have one of our new 1x1 AR9285 devices (all AR9285
> devices are 1x1) then you'll need at least 2.6.29. If you want to
> start using ath9k on APs with AHB you will need at least 2.6.30 (still
> in RC series).
>
> As usual if you happen to be stuck on older kernels for one reason or
> another you can always use compat-wireless [2] and if that happens to
> be a little too bleeding edge we have now compat-wireless releases for
> stable kernel releases, starting as of the 2.6.30-rc series [3].
>
>   Luis
>
> [1] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k
> [2] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download
> [3] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable
>   
Thanks for the update.  If i want to use multiple AP's with Ath9k it it 
still best to use wireless-testing?  Is multiple AP support in 2.6.30-rc 
series net-next or wireless-next?

Thanks.
--
Karl

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Karl Hiramoto <karl@hiramoto.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 12:02:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A02B1CA.3060708@hiramoto.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43e72e890905070104u59eebcceu18718a733e388cc9@mail.gmail.com>

Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> For those not subscribed to the ath9k wiki on wireless.kernel.org [1]
> (which we recommend you do if you're a user) here's a quick note to
> let you know our latest kernel recommendations for using ath9k:
>
>   *  >= 2.6.27.22
>   *  >= 2.6.28.10
>   *  2.6.29
>
> If you want 802.11n support or AP support you'll want at least 2.6.29.
> If you happen to have one of our new 1x1 AR9285 devices (all AR9285
> devices are 1x1) then you'll need at least 2.6.29. If you want to
> start using ath9k on APs with AHB you will need at least 2.6.30 (still
> in RC series).
>
> As usual if you happen to be stuck on older kernels for one reason or
> another you can always use compat-wireless [2] and if that happens to
> be a little too bleeding edge we have now compat-wireless releases for
> stable kernel releases, starting as of the 2.6.30-rc series [3].
>
>   Luis
>
> [1] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k
> [2] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download
> [3] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable
>   
Thanks for the update.  If i want to use multiple AP's with Ath9k it it 
still best to use wireless-testing?  Is multiple AP support in 2.6.30-rc 
series net-next or wireless-next?

Thanks.
--
Karl

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-07 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-07  8:04 [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-05-07  8:04 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-05-07  8:04 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-05-07 10:02 ` Karl Hiramoto [this message]
2009-05-07 10:02   ` [ath9k-devel] " Karl Hiramoto
2009-05-07 10:02   ` Karl Hiramoto
2009-05-07 17:20   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-05-07 17:20     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-05-07 17:20     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-05-09  5:50     ` Jason Daly
2009-05-09  5:50       ` Jason Daly
2009-05-09  5:50       ` Jason Daly
2009-05-08  9:02       ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-08  9:02         ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-08  9:02         ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-08 17:15         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-05-08 17:15           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-05-08 17:15           ` Luis R. Rodriguez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A02B1CA.3060708@hiramoto.org \
    --to=karl@hiramoto.org \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.