From: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: "davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com"
<davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com>,
"Narnakaje, Snehaprabha" <nsnehaprabha@ti.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] NAND on DM355: Add 4-bit ECC support for large page NAND chips
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 15:37:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A0362A5.3010101@boundarydevices.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200905071011.06812.david-b@pacbell.net>
>>>> +static struct nand_ecclayout hwecc4_2048 __initconst = {
>>>> + .eccbytes = 10,
>>> Not ".eccbytes = 40"? This is 4 chunks, 10 ecc bytes each...
>> No, .eccbytes is for each chips->ecc.steps.
>
> So it's the same as ecc.bytes, which is not exported to userspace.
>
>
>> And all nand read/write
>> APIs, we handle ecc.steps (for loop). There is chips->ecc.total that
>> is initialized as (chips->ecc.steps * chips->ecc.bytes).
>>
>> It is strange that .eccbytes is for each chunk, while eccpos[] and
>> .oobfree[] have to handle/cover all chunks.
No, eccbytes should equal ecc.total
i.e. from nand_base.c
static struct nand_ecclayout nand_oob_64 = {
.eccbytes = 24,
.eccpos = {
40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47,
48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55,
56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63},
.oobfree = {
{.offset = 2,
.length = 38}}
};
Troy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-07 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-07 2:29 [PATCH 2/2] NAND on DM355: Add 4-bit ECC support for large page NAND chips nsnehaprabha
2009-05-07 7:16 ` David Brownell
2009-05-07 14:13 ` Narnakaje, Snehaprabha
2009-05-07 17:11 ` David Brownell
2009-05-07 18:02 ` Narnakaje, Snehaprabha
2009-05-07 22:37 ` Troy Kisky [this message]
2009-05-08 0:03 ` Narnakaje, Snehaprabha
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-07 8:59 vimal singh
2009-05-07 9:11 ` David Brownell
[not found] <46149.192.168.10.89.1241686786.squirrel@dbdmail.itg.ti.com>
2009-05-07 9:50 ` vimal singh
2009-05-07 16:54 ` David Brownell
[not found] <43965.192.168.10.89.1241763647.squirrel@dbdmail.itg.ti.com>
2009-05-09 4:24 ` vimal singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A0362A5.3010101@boundarydevices.com \
--to=troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nsnehaprabha@ti.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.