From: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: "Greg Freemyer" <greg.freemyer@gmail.com>,
"Jörn Engel" <joern@logfs.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox" <willy@linux.intel.com>,
"Jens Axboe" <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
"Linux RAID" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Is TRIM/DISCARD going to be a performance problem?
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 10:29:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A08365F.5040805@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090511142740.GC6277@mit.edu>
On 05/11/2009 10:27 AM, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 09:10:15AM -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
>> That implies that the SSD folks are not treating erase blocks as a
>> contiguous group of sectors.
>
> Correct.
>
>> For some reason, I thought their was
>> only one mapping per erase block and within the erase block the
>> sectors were contiguous..
>
> No, if you try to treat erase blocks as a contiguous group of
> sectors, you'll have terrible write amplification problems (leading to
> premature death of the SSD) and terrible small random write
> performance. Flash devices optimized for digital cameras might have
> done that, but for SSD's, this will result in catastrophically bad
> performance, and very limited lifespan. As I said, I expect these
> SSD's to be weeded out of the market very shortly.
>
> For any sane implementation of an SSD, the mapping will be on a per
> LBA basis, not on a per-erase block basis.
>
>> More realistic is to figure out a way to make it deterministic at
>> least for the short term (by writing data to all the trimmed blocks?),
>> then reshaping, then having a tool to scan the filesystem and re-issue
>> all the trim commands.
>
> Writing data to all of the trimmed block? Um, no. That would be a
> diaster, since it accelerates the wear and tear of the SSD. The whole
> *point* of the TRIM command is to avoid needing to do that.
>
> The whole worry about determinism is highly overrated. If the
> filesystem doesn't need a block, then it doesn't need it. What you
> read after you send a TRIM command, whether it is the old data because
> the device applied some kind of rounding, or random data, or all
> zero's, won't matter to the filesystem. Why should the filesystem
> care? I know I certainly don't....
>
> - Ted
The key is not at the FS layer - this is an issue for people who RAID these
beasts together and want to actually check that the bits are what they should be
(say doing a checksum validity check for a stripe).
ric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-11 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-09 21:14 Is TRIM/DISCARD going to be a performance problem? Theodore Ts'o
2009-05-10 16:53 ` Jörn Engel
2009-05-11 8:37 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-11 10:06 ` Jörn Engel
2009-05-11 10:18 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-11 15:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-05-11 11:27 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-11 12:09 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-11 13:10 ` Greg Freemyer
2009-05-11 13:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-11 14:27 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-11 14:29 ` Ric Wheeler [this message]
2009-05-11 14:50 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-11 14:58 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-05-11 15:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-11 18:47 ` Greg Freemyer
2009-05-11 19:22 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-05-11 23:38 ` Neil Brown
2009-05-12 13:28 ` Greg Freemyer
2009-05-11 13:15 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-04-24 17:11 ` Phillip Susi
2009-05-11 12:43 ` Jörn Engel
2009-05-11 12:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
[not found] ` <f3177b9e0905111433i40e41c90r920d7ccf36442ffd@mail.gmail.com>
2009-05-11 22:03 ` Chris Worley
2009-05-11 16:30 ` Chris Worley
2009-05-11 8:12 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-11 8:41 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-11 8:49 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-11 17:18 ` Chris Mason
2009-05-11 18:43 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-11 18:53 ` Chris Mason
2009-05-11 19:19 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-29 10:52 ` Florian Weimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A08365F.5040805@redhat.com \
--to=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=greg.freemyer@gmail.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=joern@logfs.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.