From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] zone_reclaim_mode is always 0 by default
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 10:47:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A0ADD88.9080705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090513120729.5885.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] zone_reclaim_mode is always 0 by default
>
> Current linux policy is, if the machine has large remote node distance,
> zone_reclaim_mode is enabled by default because we've be able to assume to
> large distance mean large server until recently.
>
> Unfrotunately, recent modern x86 CPU (e.g. Core i7, Opeteron) have P2P transport
> memory controller. IOW it's NUMA from software view.
>
> Some Core i7 machine has large remote node distance and zone_reclaim don't
> fit desktop and small file server. it cause performance degression.
>
> Thus, zone_reclaim == 0 is better by default. sorry, HPC gusy.
> you need to turn zone_reclaim_mode on manually now.
I'll believe that it causes a performance regression with the
old zone_reclaim behaviour, however the way you tweaked
zone_reclaim should make it behave a lot better, no?
--
All rights reversed.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] zone_reclaim_mode is always 0 by default
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 10:47:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A0ADD88.9080705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090513120729.5885.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] zone_reclaim_mode is always 0 by default
>
> Current linux policy is, if the machine has large remote node distance,
> zone_reclaim_mode is enabled by default because we've be able to assume to
> large distance mean large server until recently.
>
> Unfrotunately, recent modern x86 CPU (e.g. Core i7, Opeteron) have P2P transport
> memory controller. IOW it's NUMA from software view.
>
> Some Core i7 machine has large remote node distance and zone_reclaim don't
> fit desktop and small file server. it cause performance degression.
>
> Thus, zone_reclaim == 0 is better by default. sorry, HPC gusy.
> you need to turn zone_reclaim_mode on manually now.
I'll believe that it causes a performance regression with the
old zone_reclaim behaviour, however the way you tweaked
zone_reclaim should make it behave a lot better, no?
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-13 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-13 3:06 [PATCH 0/4] various zone_reclaim cleanup KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-13 3:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-13 3:06 ` [PATCH 1/4] vmscan: change the number of the unmapped files in zone reclaim KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-13 3:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-13 13:31 ` Rik van Riel
2009-05-13 13:31 ` Rik van Riel
2009-05-14 19:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-14 19:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-18 3:15 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-18 3:15 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-18 3:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-18 3:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-18 3:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-18 3:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-19 1:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-19 1:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-13 3:06 ` [PATCH 2/4] vmscan: drop PF_SWAPWRITE from zone_reclaim KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-13 3:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-13 13:35 ` Rik van Riel
2009-05-13 13:35 ` Rik van Riel
2009-05-14 19:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-14 19:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-18 3:33 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-18 3:33 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-13 3:07 ` [PATCH 3/4] vmscan: zone_reclaim use may_swap KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-13 3:07 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-13 11:26 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-05-13 11:26 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-05-13 14:43 ` Rik van Riel
2009-05-13 14:43 ` Rik van Riel
2009-05-14 19:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-14 19:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-18 3:35 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-18 3:35 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-13 3:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] zone_reclaim_mode is always 0 by default KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-13 3:08 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-13 14:47 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2009-05-13 14:47 ` Rik van Riel
2009-05-14 8:20 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-14 8:20 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-14 11:48 ` Robin Holt
2009-05-14 11:48 ` Robin Holt
2009-05-14 12:02 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-14 12:02 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-13 15:22 ` Robin Holt
2009-05-13 15:22 ` Robin Holt
2009-05-14 20:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-14 20:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-14 20:23 ` Rik van Riel
2009-05-14 20:23 ` Rik van Riel
2009-05-14 20:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-14 20:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-15 1:02 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-15 1:02 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-15 10:51 ` Robin Holt
2009-05-15 10:51 ` Robin Holt
2009-05-19 2:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-19 2:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-20 14:00 ` Robin Holt
2009-05-20 14:00 ` Robin Holt
2009-05-21 2:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-21 2:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-21 13:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-21 13:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-21 13:57 ` Robin Holt
2009-05-21 13:57 ` Robin Holt
2009-05-24 13:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-24 13:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-15 18:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-15 18:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-18 3:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-18 3:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-19 1:16 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-05-19 1:16 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-05-19 2:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-19 2:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-19 2:57 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-19 2:57 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-19 3:38 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-05-19 3:38 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-05-19 4:30 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-19 4:30 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-19 5:06 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-05-19 5:06 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-05-19 7:09 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-19 7:09 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-19 7:15 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-05-19 7:15 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-05-18 9:09 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-18 9:09 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A0ADD88.9080705@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.