Re: [PATCH 0/4] FS: userspace notification of errors

[Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>]

Kay Sievers wrote:
> And I don't think we want several event sources for the same thing,
> uevents _and_ pollable sysfs files.
> 
> We already raise events on /proc/self/mountinfo when the mount tree
> changes, I guess that's where fs specific stuff belongs, and it will
> work with all kind of filesystem setups, regardless of the devices
> below it. This is also the established interface for flags and options
> and the current state of the filesystem, and does not mix filesystem
> options into block device interfaces.
> 
> /proc/self/mountinfo could also work properly with namespaces which
> might have different meaning for a device in a different namespace.

Well, Denis suggests /sys/fs instead. But how would we pass stuff like
error code via /proc/self/mountinfo? And what if later some one wants
to provide user-space stuff like bogus inode number? IMO, /sys/fs
sounds better.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html