All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	bonding-devel@lists.sf.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: bonding module can only be loaded once
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:27:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A2E8D62.6090004@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4752.1244564082@death.nxdomain.ibm.com>

Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote:
> 
>> In any case, this is not the first time this has been broken and the
>> fundamental reason is in my opinion that the bonding interface is
>> broken to begin with. The module aliasing thing is complete crap
>> and should have been phased out long ago. At this point its probably
>> not worth anymore to migrate people to the sysfs interface though,
>> the best thing would be to add an rtnl_link interface and phase out
>> both.
> 
> 	The "load bonding multiple times" stuff is only there now for
> backwards compatibility with old distro initscripts / sysconfig packages
> that don't configure bonding through sysfs (a sysfs API was added to
> bonding three or four years ago).
> 
> 	All of the current distro releases I'm aware of use sysfs to
> configure bonding, and have done so for at least a year or two.  I
> haven't done an exhaustive survey, but it seems unlikely that users are
> running a current up to date kernel with a two or three year old
> initscripts / sysconfig package.  Anybody have information to the
> contrary?

I'd expect its not the distros, but rather the applicances which might
still be using this. I know a vendor I used to work for a couple of
years ago just recently made the switch from 2.6.16 to a current kernel,
and I'd expect that they are still using this (I can find out tommorrow
if you want to know for sure). Vyatta likewise, I guess.

> 	If nobody has any heartburn at dropping support for multiple
> bonding instances on old distros, I'm as happy as anybody to remove all
> of the multiple load logic from bonding.  There's been plenty of time
> for transitioning from "multiple load" to sysfs.

In my opinion it would need a feature-removal-schedule announcement.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-09 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-08 22:11 BUG: bonding module can only be loaded once Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-09 12:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-09 15:02   ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-09 15:33     ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-09 16:14       ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-06-09 16:27         ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2009-06-09 17:23           ` [PATCH] bonding: fix multiple module load problem Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-09 17:37             ` [Bonding-devel] " Jay Vosburgh
2009-06-09 17:24           ` [Bonding-devel] BUG: bonding module can only be loaded once Jay Vosburgh
2009-06-09 22:14             ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-10 13:19               ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-10  6:07           ` [PATCH] bonding: fix multiple module load problem Stephen Hemminger
2009-06-11 12:44             ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A2E8D62.6090004@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bonding-devel@lists.sf.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.