Re: [Qemu-devel] kqemu poll results

[Christian Laursen <xi@borderworlds.dk>]

Filip Navara wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Christian Laursen <xi@borderworlds.dk 
> <mailto:xi@borderworlds.dk>> wrote:
> 
>     Anthony Liguori wrote:
> 
>         http://www.micropoll.com/akira/mpresult/604126-172373
> 
>         Surprisingly, BSD host seems to be a dominating factor.
> 
> 
>     Until a few days ago, qemu+kqemu was the only practical way to run a
>     virtual machine on FreeBSD. Virtualbox has just been committed to
>     ports and a number of users will probably switch to using that now.
> 
>     Personally I would prefer qemu+kvm if there was a FreeBSD port of
>     kvm. I probably lack both the time and skills to help with that. :(
> 
> 
> http://feanor.sssup.it/~fabio/freebsd/lkvm/

As far as I can tell this is pretty far from being usable. It was not 
complete at the end of SoC and was not imported to either the src tree 
or as a port and has thus not been maintained since then.

Does anyone know if it has bitrotted too much to serve as a starting 
point for a working port?


-- 
Christian Laursen