All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Planning for the 0.11.0 release
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:57:25 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A401A65.3080804@us.ibm.com> (raw)

Hi,

It's getting to be about the time to start thinking about the 0.11.0 
release.  0.10.0 was released on March 2nd so following with the 6 month 
release cycle, that would put 0.11.0 at September 2nd.

Based on the experiences with the stable releases, here's what I'd 
recommend:

 o On July 15th, fork master -> stable-0.11
 o Change version to 0.10.90
 o Release qemu-0.11.0-rc1
 o Release additional -rcN releases every 1-2 weeks
 o Introduce a new maintainer for stable-0.10 (via git pulls)
 o At least 1 week before release, hopefully we'll have the final -rcN 
that we can then declare 0.11.0.

I think we should really try hard to make these dates.  I only have a 
few things that I would like to see happen before forking stable-0.11.  
Namely:

 o Setup qemu.org infrastructure (git hosting, wiki)
 o Setup qemu bug tracker (see next mail)
 o Include all ROM source code in tree via git submodules.  This is a 
major headache for distributors and I think it's important to resolve 
before our next release.
 o Disable kqemu by default.  The intention is _not_ to remove kqemu 
support.  Enabling kqemu by default causes a few unpleasant side effects 
including errors if -m is greater than 1/2 of the host physical memory.

I don't expect the qdev conversion will be complete by 0.11.  I think we 
should try to get as much of the invasive changes as possible in to make 
stable-0.11 as maintainable as possible.  However, I think it would be a 
mistake to gate the release on qdev.

-- 
Regards,

Anthony Liguori


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Planning for the 0.11.0 release
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:57:25 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A401A65.3080804@us.ibm.com> (raw)

Hi,

It's getting to be about the time to start thinking about the 0.11.0 
release.  0.10.0 was released on March 2nd so following with the 6 month 
release cycle, that would put 0.11.0 at September 2nd.

Based on the experiences with the stable releases, here's what I'd 
recommend:

 o On July 15th, fork master -> stable-0.11
 o Change version to 0.10.90
 o Release qemu-0.11.0-rc1
 o Release additional -rcN releases every 1-2 weeks
 o Introduce a new maintainer for stable-0.10 (via git pulls)
 o At least 1 week before release, hopefully we'll have the final -rcN 
that we can then declare 0.11.0.

I think we should really try hard to make these dates.  I only have a 
few things that I would like to see happen before forking stable-0.11.  
Namely:

 o Setup qemu.org infrastructure (git hosting, wiki)
 o Setup qemu bug tracker (see next mail)
 o Include all ROM source code in tree via git submodules.  This is a 
major headache for distributors and I think it's important to resolve 
before our next release.
 o Disable kqemu by default.  The intention is _not_ to remove kqemu 
support.  Enabling kqemu by default causes a few unpleasant side effects 
including errors if -m is greater than 1/2 of the host physical memory.

I don't expect the qdev conversion will be complete by 0.11.  I think we 
should try to get as much of the invasive changes as possible in to make 
stable-0.11 as maintainable as possible.  However, I think it would be a 
mistake to gate the release on qdev.

-- 
Regards,

Anthony Liguori

             reply	other threads:[~2009-06-22 23:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-22 23:57 Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-06-22 23:57 ` [Qemu-devel] Planning for the 0.11.0 release Anthony Liguori
2009-06-23 12:12 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-23 15:09 ` Blue Swirl
2009-06-23 15:47   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-06-23 15:49   ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-09  8:27 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-07-09 13:32   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10  1:10     ` Markus Armbruster
2009-07-10  1:10       ` Markus Armbruster
2009-07-10 13:53       ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 15:04         ` Jan Kiszka
2009-07-10 15:04           ` Jan Kiszka
2009-07-10 15:49           ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 15:49             ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 16:23             ` Jan Kiszka
2009-07-10 16:23               ` Jan Kiszka
2009-07-10 16:33               ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 16:33                 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 16:52                 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-07-10 16:52                   ` Jan Kiszka
2009-07-10 17:03                   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 17:03                     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 17:15                     ` Jan Kiszka
2009-07-10 17:15                       ` Jan Kiszka
2009-07-10 17:40                     ` Paul Brook
2009-07-10 17:40                       ` Paul Brook
2009-07-10 17:58                       ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 17:58                         ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 18:02                       ` Jan Kiszka
2009-07-10 18:02                         ` Jan Kiszka
2009-07-10 18:22                         ` Paul Brook
2009-07-10 18:22                           ` Paul Brook
2009-07-10 16:55             ` Kevin Wolf
2009-07-10 16:59               ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 17:10                 ` Kevin Wolf
2009-07-10 17:31                   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 17:10                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-10 17:12                   ` Kevin Wolf
2009-07-10 17:12                     ` Kevin Wolf
2009-07-10 18:26                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-10 18:26                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-10 17:29                   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 18:13                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-10 18:13                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-10 18:29                       ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-10 17:06               ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-12  8:31                 ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A401A65.3080804@us.ibm.com \
    --to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.