* [refpolicy] services_shorewall.patch
@ 2009-06-09 1:07 Daniel J Walsh
2009-06-22 13:59 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel J Walsh @ 2009-06-09 1:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: refpolicy
http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F11/services_shorewall.patch
Shorewall policy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [refpolicy] services_shorewall.patch
2009-06-09 1:07 [refpolicy] services_shorewall.patch Daniel J Walsh
@ 2009-06-22 13:59 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2009-06-22 20:45 ` Daniel J Walsh
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Christopher J. PeBenito @ 2009-06-22 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: refpolicy
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 21:07 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F11/services_shorewall.patch
>
> Shorewall policy
I don't understand why this is written as a service. As far as I can
tell from the documentation, its not a service; it just does iptables
configuration.
--
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
(410) 290-1411 x150
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [refpolicy] services_shorewall.patch
2009-06-22 13:59 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
@ 2009-06-22 20:45 ` Daniel J Walsh
2009-06-23 12:35 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel J Walsh @ 2009-06-22 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: refpolicy
On 06/22/2009 09:59 AM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 21:07 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F11/services_shorewall.patch
>>
>> Shorewall policy
>
> I don't understand why this is written as a service. As far as I can
> tell from the documentation, its not a service; it just does iptables
> configuration.
>
I got this from someone else. So you think it should just be added to
iptables config.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [refpolicy] services_shorewall.patch
2009-06-22 20:45 ` Daniel J Walsh
@ 2009-06-23 12:35 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2009-06-23 13:13 ` Daniel J Walsh
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Christopher J. PeBenito @ 2009-06-23 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: refpolicy
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 16:45 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 06/22/2009 09:59 AM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 21:07 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> >> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F11/services_shorewall.patch
> >>
> >> Shorewall policy
> >
> > I don't understand why this is written as a service. As far as I can
> > tell from the documentation, its not a service; it just does iptables
> > configuration.
>
> I got this from someone else. So you think it should just be added to
> iptables config.
Not necessarily. It may be sufficient to change the
init_daemon_domain() to init_system_domain and then moving it into admin
layer.
--
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
(410) 290-1411 x150
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [refpolicy] services_shorewall.patch
2009-06-23 12:35 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
@ 2009-06-23 13:13 ` Daniel J Walsh
2009-06-23 13:27 ` Miroslav Grepl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel J Walsh @ 2009-06-23 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: refpolicy
On 06/23/2009 08:35 AM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 16:45 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> On 06/22/2009 09:59 AM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 21:07 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>>> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F11/services_shorewall.patch
>>>>
>>>> Shorewall policy
>>> I don't understand why this is written as a service. As far as I can
>>> tell from the documentation, its not a service; it just does iptables
>>> configuration.
>> I got this from someone else. So you think it should just be added to
>> iptables config.
>
> Not necessarily. It may be sufficient to change the
> init_daemon_domain() to init_system_domain and then moving it into admin
> layer.
>
Miroslav wrote the domain, so I guess it is between you two. I think
the init_system_domain is fine.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [refpolicy] services_shorewall.patch
2009-06-23 13:13 ` Daniel J Walsh
@ 2009-06-23 13:27 ` Miroslav Grepl
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Miroslav Grepl @ 2009-06-23 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: refpolicy
On 06/23/2009 03:13 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 06/23/2009 08:35 AM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 16:45 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>> On 06/22/2009 09:59 AM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 21:07 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>>>> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F11/services_shorewall.patch
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Shorewall policy
>>>> I don't understand why this is written as a service. As far as I can
>>>> tell from the documentation, its not a service; it just does iptables
>>>> configuration.
>>> I got this from someone else. So you think it should just be added to
>>> iptables config.
>>
>> Not necessarily. It may be sufficient to change the
>> init_daemon_domain() to init_system_domain and then moving it into admin
>> layer.
>>
>
> Miroslav wrote the domain, so I guess it is between you two. I think
> the init_system_domain is fine.
Right now I am testing what Chris suggests. It seems fine.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [refpolicy] services_shorewall.patch
@ 2009-08-28 20:27 Daniel J Walsh
2009-09-02 12:59 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel J Walsh @ 2009-08-28 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: refpolicy
http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F12/services_shorewall.patch
shorewall firewall policy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [refpolicy] services_shorewall.patch
@ 2009-05-21 14:02 Daniel J Walsh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel J Walsh @ 2009-05-21 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: refpolicy
http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F11/services_shorewall.patch
Policy for shorewall firewall.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-02 12:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-06-09 1:07 [refpolicy] services_shorewall.patch Daniel J Walsh
2009-06-22 13:59 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2009-06-22 20:45 ` Daniel J Walsh
2009-06-23 12:35 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2009-06-23 13:13 ` Daniel J Walsh
2009-06-23 13:27 ` Miroslav Grepl
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-08-28 20:27 Daniel J Walsh
2009-09-02 12:59 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2009-05-21 14:02 Daniel J Walsh
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.