From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux NFS ML <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: 2.6.31-rc3 nfsv4 client regression (oops)
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:19:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A5D2E8D.1080701@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1247571788.19099.32.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 03:48 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> The NFSv4 client just oops'd on me...
>>
>> NFSv4 client: 2.6.31-rc3, Fedora 10, x86-64
>> 2.6.30 works, I think 2.6.31-rc1 worked too
>>
>> NFSv4 server: 2.6.29.4-167.fc11.x86_64 (Fedora 11 kernel), F11, x86-64
>>
>> Oops output captured at kerneloops.org:
>> http://www.kerneloops.org/raw.php?rawid=537858&msgid=
>>
>> Kernel config for 2.6.31-rc3, the problematic kernel, attached.
>>
>>
>>> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa02db5b0>] [<ffffffffa02db5b0>] nfs4_free_lock_state+0x20/0x80 [nfs]
>>> [...]
>>> Call Trace:
>>> [<ffffffffa02db7dd>] nfs4_set_lock_state+0x1cd/0x220 [nfs]
>>> [<ffffffffa02cc9db>] nfs4_proc_lock+0x2cb/0x4e0 [nfs]
>>> [<ffffffff810b40dc>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x10c/0x600
>>> [<ffffffffa02b6079>] do_setlk+0xb9/0xd0 [nfs]
>>> [<ffffffffa02b6220>] nfs_lock+0xd0/0x1d0 [nfs]
>>> [<ffffffff8111e883>] vfs_lock_file+0x23/0x50
>>> [<ffffffff8111eaa3>] fcntl_setlk+0x133/0x2f0
>>> [<ffffffff81192571>] ? __up_read+0x91/0xb0
>>> [<ffffffff810f0fea>] sys_fcntl+0xca/0x420
>>> [<ffffffff8100b4fb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
> Wow... That bug appears to have been there for years. I'm surprised it
> hasn't been reported before.
>
> Anyhow, it looks to me as if you are hitting the case in
> nfs4_get_lock_state() where the first call to __nfs4_find_lock_state()
> fails, (and so 'new' gets allocated) then the second call succeeds. When
> the routine attempts to free the now redundant 'new', the call to
> nfs4_free_lock_state() oopses because new->ls_state hasn't been set.
>
> The following patch ought to fix it...
>
> ---------------------
> From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
> NFSv4: Fix an Oops in nfs4_free_lock_state
>
> The oops http://www.kerneloops.org/raw.php?rawid=537858&msgid= appears to
> be due to the nfs4_lock_state->ls_state field being uninitialised. This
> happens if the call to nfs4_free_lock_state() is triggered at the end of
> nfs4_get_lock_state().
>
> The fixe is to move the initialisation of ls_state into the allocator.
>
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Thanks, I'll give it a try!
Jeff
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux NFS ML <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: 2.6.31-rc3 nfsv4 client regression (oops)
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:19:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A5D2E8D.1080701@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1247571788.19099.32.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 03:48 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> The NFSv4 client just oops'd on me...
>>
>> NFSv4 client: 2.6.31-rc3, Fedora 10, x86-64
>> 2.6.30 works, I think 2.6.31-rc1 worked too
>>
>> NFSv4 server: 2.6.29.4-167.fc11.x86_64 (Fedora 11 kernel), F11, x86-64
>>
>> Oops output captured at kerneloops.org:
>> http://www.kerneloops.org/raw.php?rawid=537858&msgid=
>>
>> Kernel config for 2.6.31-rc3, the problematic kernel, attached.
>>
>>
>>> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa02db5b0>] [<ffffffffa02db5b0>] nfs4_free_lock_state+0x20/0x80 [nfs]
>>> [...]
>>> Call Trace:
>>> [<ffffffffa02db7dd>] nfs4_set_lock_state+0x1cd/0x220 [nfs]
>>> [<ffffffffa02cc9db>] nfs4_proc_lock+0x2cb/0x4e0 [nfs]
>>> [<ffffffff810b40dc>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x10c/0x600
>>> [<ffffffffa02b6079>] do_setlk+0xb9/0xd0 [nfs]
>>> [<ffffffffa02b6220>] nfs_lock+0xd0/0x1d0 [nfs]
>>> [<ffffffff8111e883>] vfs_lock_file+0x23/0x50
>>> [<ffffffff8111eaa3>] fcntl_setlk+0x133/0x2f0
>>> [<ffffffff81192571>] ? __up_read+0x91/0xb0
>>> [<ffffffff810f0fea>] sys_fcntl+0xca/0x420
>>> [<ffffffff8100b4fb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
> Wow... That bug appears to have been there for years. I'm surprised it
> hasn't been reported before.
>
> Anyhow, it looks to me as if you are hitting the case in
> nfs4_get_lock_state() where the first call to __nfs4_find_lock_state()
> fails, (and so 'new' gets allocated) then the second call succeeds. When
> the routine attempts to free the now redundant 'new', the call to
> nfs4_free_lock_state() oopses because new->ls_state hasn't been set.
>
> The following patch ought to fix it...
>
> ---------------------
> From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
> NFSv4: Fix an Oops in nfs4_free_lock_state
>
> The oops http://www.kerneloops.org/raw.php?rawid=537858&msgid= appears to
> be due to the nfs4_lock_state->ls_state field being uninitialised. This
> happens if the call to nfs4_free_lock_state() is triggered at the end of
> nfs4_get_lock_state().
>
> The fixe is to move the initialisation of ls_state into the allocator.
>
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Thanks, I'll give it a try!
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-15 1:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-14 7:48 2.6.31-rc3 nfsv4 client regression (oops) Jeff Garzik
2009-07-14 11:43 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1247571788.19099.32.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-15 1:19 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2009-07-15 1:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-07-21 23:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-07-21 23:08 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A5D2E8D.1080701@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.