* [PATCH] Emulate BLKRRPART on device-mapper
@ 2009-07-08 8:44 Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-07-20 18:23 ` Alasdair G Kergon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nikanth Karthikesan @ 2009-07-08 8:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alasdair G Kergon; +Cc: device-mapper development
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Emulate BLKRRPART on device-mapper
Partitions on device-mapper devices are managed by kpartx (if at
all). So if we were just to send out a 'change' event if someone
called BLKRRPART on these devices, kpartx will be triggered via udev
and can manage the partitions accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
---
Index: linux-2.6-dm/drivers/md/dm.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-dm.orig/drivers/md/dm.c
+++ linux-2.6-dm/drivers/md/dm.c
@@ -394,19 +394,25 @@ static int dm_blk_ioctl(struct block_dev
if (!map || !dm_table_get_size(map))
goto out;
- /* We only support devices that have a single target */
- if (dm_table_get_num_targets(map) != 1)
- goto out;
-
- tgt = dm_table_get_target(map, 0);
-
if (dm_suspended(md)) {
r = -EAGAIN;
goto out;
}
- if (tgt->type->ioctl)
- r = tgt->type->ioctl(tgt, cmd, arg);
+ if (cmd == BLKRRPART) {
+ /* Emulate Re-read partitions table */
+ kobject_uevent(&disk_to_dev(md->disk)->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
+ r = 0;
+ } else {
+ /* We only support devices that have a single target */
+ if (dm_table_get_num_targets(map) != 1)
+ goto out;
+
+ tgt = dm_table_get_target(map, 0);
+
+ if (tgt->type->ioctl)
+ r = tgt->type->ioctl(tgt, cmd, arg);
+ }
out:
dm_table_put(map);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Emulate BLKRRPART on device-mapper 2009-07-08 8:44 [PATCH] Emulate BLKRRPART on device-mapper Nikanth Karthikesan @ 2009-07-20 18:23 ` Alasdair G Kergon 2009-07-21 16:13 ` [PATCH][RFC] " Milan Broz 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Alasdair G Kergon @ 2009-07-20 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nikanth Karthikesan, Hannes Reinecke; +Cc: device-mapper development On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:14:50PM +0530, Nikanth Karthikesan wrote: > From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> > Subject: Emulate BLKRRPART on device-mapper > > Partitions on device-mapper devices are managed by kpartx (if at > all). So if we were just to send out a 'change' event if someone > called BLKRRPART on these devices, kpartx will be triggered via udev > and can manage the partitions accordingly. > > Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> > Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de> Please could I have a 'Tested-by' for this one? I agree with the idea, but I need some evidence that this specific patch works correctly. (The block layer is supposed to handle that class of ioctls itself and I didn't think dm saw them.) Alasdair ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH][RFC] Emulate BLKRRPART on device-mapper 2009-07-20 18:23 ` Alasdair G Kergon @ 2009-07-21 16:13 ` Milan Broz 2009-07-22 7:06 ` Hannes Reinecke 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Milan Broz @ 2009-07-21 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: device-mapper development Cc: Nikanth Karthikesan, Alasdair G Kergon, Jens Axboe Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:14:50PM +0530, Nikanth Karthikesan wrote: > >> From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> >> Subject: Emulate BLKRRPART on device-mapper >> >> Partitions on device-mapper devices are managed by kpartx (if at >> all). So if we were just to send out a 'change' event if someone >> called BLKRRPART on these devices, kpartx will be triggered via udev >> and can manage the partitions accordingly. >> >> > Please could I have a 'Tested-by' for this one? > I am afraid that this patch cannot work, BLRRPART never reach this code. I tried another idea - or is there better way how to achieve that? Milan --- From: Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com> Add genhd flag requesting notification of partition changes only. This patch provides notification mechanism which allows handle partition code in userspace. If the BLKRRPART ioctl arrives and GENHD_FL_PARTITION_CHANGE_NOTIFY is set, just send uevent and ignore in-kernel partitioning code. This is useful e.g. for device-mapper devices, which can use kpartx or similar tool in udev rules. Signed-off-by: Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com> --- block/ioctl.c | 3 ++- drivers/md/dm.c | 1 + fs/partitions/check.c | 6 ++++++ include/linux/genhd.h | 8 ++++++++ 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c index 500e4c7..bce793f 100644 --- a/block/ioctl.c +++ b/block/ioctl.c @@ -101,7 +101,8 @@ static int blkdev_reread_part(struct block_device *bdev) struct gendisk *disk = bdev->bd_disk; int res; - if (!disk_partitionable(disk) || bdev != bdev->bd_contains) + if (!disk_userspace_partitions(disk) && + (!disk_partitionable(disk) || bdev != bdev->bd_contains)) return -EINVAL; if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) return -EACCES; diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c index 9acd54a..1186ce1 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm.c @@ -1791,6 +1791,7 @@ static struct mapped_device *alloc_dev(int minor) md->disk->queue = md->queue; md->disk->private_data = md; sprintf(md->disk->disk_name, "dm-%d", minor); + md->disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_PARTITION_CHANGE_NOTIFY; add_disk(md->disk); format_dev_t(md->name, MKDEV(_major, minor)); diff --git a/fs/partitions/check.c b/fs/partitions/check.c index ea4e6cb..bb42c44 100644 --- a/fs/partitions/check.c +++ b/fs/partitions/check.c @@ -521,6 +521,12 @@ int rescan_partitions(struct gendisk *disk, struct block_device *bdev) struct parsed_partitions *state; int p, highest, res; + /* partitions handled in userspace, just send change event */ + if (disk_userspace_partitions(disk)) { + kobject_uevent(&disk_to_dev(disk)->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE); + return 0; + } + if (bdev->bd_part_count) return -EBUSY; res = invalidate_partition(disk, 0); diff --git a/include/linux/genhd.h b/include/linux/genhd.h index 45fc320..a241bd6 100644 --- a/include/linux/genhd.h +++ b/include/linux/genhd.h @@ -116,6 +116,9 @@ struct hd_struct { #define GENHD_FL_EXT_DEVT 64 /* allow extended devt */ #define GENHD_FL_NATIVE_CAPACITY 128 +/* notify udev instead of use in-kernel partitioning */ +#define GENHD_FL_PARTITION_CHANGE_NOTIFY 256 + #define BLK_SCSI_MAX_CMDS (256) #define BLK_SCSI_CMD_PER_LONG (BLK_SCSI_MAX_CMDS / (sizeof(long) * 8)) @@ -180,6 +183,11 @@ static inline struct gendisk *part_to_disk(struct hd_struct *part) return NULL; } +static inline bool disk_userspace_partitions(struct gendisk *disk) +{ + return (disk->flags & GENHD_FL_PARTITION_CHANGE_NOTIFY) ? 1 : 0; +} + static inline int disk_max_parts(struct gendisk *disk) { if (disk->flags & GENHD_FL_EXT_DEVT) ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][RFC] Emulate BLKRRPART on device-mapper 2009-07-21 16:13 ` [PATCH][RFC] " Milan Broz @ 2009-07-22 7:06 ` Hannes Reinecke 2009-07-22 8:12 ` Milan Broz 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Hannes Reinecke @ 2009-07-22 7:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Milan Broz Cc: Nikanth Karthikesan, device-mapper development, Alasdair G Kergon, Jens Axboe Milan Broz wrote: > Alasdair G Kergon wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:14:50PM +0530, Nikanth Karthikesan wrote: >> >>> From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> >>> Subject: Emulate BLKRRPART on device-mapper >>> >>> Partitions on device-mapper devices are managed by kpartx (if at >>> all). So if we were just to send out a 'change' event if someone >>> called BLKRRPART on these devices, kpartx will be triggered via udev >>> and can manage the partitions accordingly. >>> >>> >> Please could I have a 'Tested-by' for this one? >> > I am afraid that this patch cannot work, BLRRPART never reach this code. > I tried another idea - or is there better way how to achieve that? > Hey, that is cool. And what's more, that's exactly what I need for another pet-project of mine, switching off the in-kernel partitioning code altogether. But there are some comments, see below. > Milan > --- > > From: Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com> > > Add genhd flag requesting notification of partition changes only. > > This patch provides notification mechanism which allows handle partition > code in userspace. > > If the BLKRRPART ioctl arrives and GENHD_FL_PARTITION_CHANGE_NOTIFY > is set, just send uevent and ignore in-kernel partitioning code. > > This is useful e.g. for device-mapper devices, which can use kpartx > or similar tool in udev rules. > > Signed-off-by: Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com> > --- > block/ioctl.c | 3 ++- > drivers/md/dm.c | 1 + > fs/partitions/check.c | 6 ++++++ > include/linux/genhd.h | 8 ++++++++ > 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c > index 500e4c7..bce793f 100644 > --- a/block/ioctl.c > +++ b/block/ioctl.c > @@ -101,7 +101,8 @@ static int blkdev_reread_part(struct block_device *bdev) > struct gendisk *disk = bdev->bd_disk; > int res; > > - if (!disk_partitionable(disk) || bdev != bdev->bd_contains) > + if (!disk_userspace_partitions(disk) && > + (!disk_partitionable(disk) || bdev != bdev->bd_contains)) > return -EINVAL; > if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) > return -EACCES; > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c > index 9acd54a..1186ce1 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/dm.c > +++ b/drivers/md/dm.c > @@ -1791,6 +1791,7 @@ static struct mapped_device *alloc_dev(int minor) > md->disk->queue = md->queue; > md->disk->private_data = md; > sprintf(md->disk->disk_name, "dm-%d", minor); > + md->disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_PARTITION_CHANGE_NOTIFY; > add_disk(md->disk); > format_dev_t(md->name, MKDEV(_major, minor)); > > diff --git a/fs/partitions/check.c b/fs/partitions/check.c > index ea4e6cb..bb42c44 100644 > --- a/fs/partitions/check.c > +++ b/fs/partitions/check.c > @@ -521,6 +521,12 @@ int rescan_partitions(struct gendisk *disk, struct block_device *bdev) > struct parsed_partitions *state; > int p, highest, res; > > + /* partitions handled in userspace, just send change event */ > + if (disk_userspace_partitions(disk)) { > + kobject_uevent(&disk_to_dev(disk)->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE); > + return 0; > + } > + Wrong. If you do it here, you'll never be able to catch any size changes of the disk. You'll have to move it to after the 'bdev->bd_invalidated = 0' line. > if (bdev->bd_part_count) > return -EBUSY; > res = invalidate_partition(disk, 0); > diff --git a/include/linux/genhd.h b/include/linux/genhd.h > index 45fc320..a241bd6 100644 > --- a/include/linux/genhd.h > +++ b/include/linux/genhd.h > @@ -116,6 +116,9 @@ struct hd_struct { > #define GENHD_FL_EXT_DEVT 64 /* allow extended devt */ > #define GENHD_FL_NATIVE_CAPACITY 128 > > +/* notify udev instead of use in-kernel partitioning */ > +#define GENHD_FL_PARTITION_CHANGE_NOTIFY 256 > + I would suggest renaming it to GENHD_FL_USERSPACE_PARTITIONS, as this is more in line with the function of the flag. Plus I have a patch making use of it :-) I'll send an adapted patchset. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][RFC] Emulate BLKRRPART on device-mapper 2009-07-22 7:06 ` Hannes Reinecke @ 2009-07-22 8:12 ` Milan Broz 2009-07-22 8:19 ` Hannes Reinecke 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Milan Broz @ 2009-07-22 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: Nikanth Karthikesan, device-mapper development, Alasdair G Kergon, Jens Axboe Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> + /* partitions handled in userspace, just send change event */ >> + if (disk_userspace_partitions(disk)) { >> + kobject_uevent(&disk_to_dev(disk)->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE); >> + return 0; >> + } >> + > Wrong. If you do it here, you'll never be able to catch any size changes > of the disk. You'll have to move it to after the 'bdev->bd_invalidated = 0' > line. Yes, for non-DM devices which want to use that flag. For device-mapper device, size can change only by mapping table change which always generate change uevent. > I would suggest renaming it to GENHD_FL_USERSPACE_PARTITIONS, as this is > more in line with the function of the flag. no problem here:-) Milan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][RFC] Emulate BLKRRPART on device-mapper 2009-07-22 8:12 ` Milan Broz @ 2009-07-22 8:19 ` Hannes Reinecke 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Hannes Reinecke @ 2009-07-22 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Milan Broz Cc: Nikanth Karthikesan, device-mapper development, Alasdair G Kergon, Jens Axboe Milan Broz wrote: > Hannes Reinecke wrote: >>> + /* partitions handled in userspace, just send change event */ >>> + if (disk_userspace_partitions(disk)) { >>> + kobject_uevent(&disk_to_dev(disk)->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE); >>> + return 0; >>> + } >>> + >> Wrong. If you do it here, you'll never be able to catch any size changes >> of the disk. You'll have to move it to after the 'bdev->bd_invalidated = 0' >> line. > > Yes, for non-DM devices which want to use that flag. > > For device-mapper device, size can change only by mapping table change > which always generate change uevent. > Okay. But the whole point of my objections is to make the flag useable for the general populace, so that my second patch can take advantage of it. >> I would suggest renaming it to GENHD_FL_USERSPACE_PARTITIONS, as this is >> more in line with the function of the flag. > > no problem here:-) Hmm. I've send an updated patch, but it seems to be stuck in the mailqueue somewhere. The second patch went through, though ... curious. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-07-22 8:19 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2009-07-08 8:44 [PATCH] Emulate BLKRRPART on device-mapper Nikanth Karthikesan 2009-07-20 18:23 ` Alasdair G Kergon 2009-07-21 16:13 ` [PATCH][RFC] " Milan Broz 2009-07-22 7:06 ` Hannes Reinecke 2009-07-22 8:12 ` Milan Broz 2009-07-22 8:19 ` Hannes Reinecke
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.