Re: OEDEM scheduling

[Philip Balister <philip@balister.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1783 bytes --]

Phil Blundell wrote:
> The November date had 100% approval among those who responded to the
> doodle poll.  (October was second best; September was least favoured,
> and in any case the proposed September date is only four weeks away
> which is probably too close for a lot of folks.)  So, I would suggest
> that we just go ahead with the November date rather than introducing new
> alternatives at this stage. 
> 
> Either way, it'd be good to try to get the date nailed down within the
> next week or two so that everyone has adequate notice.  Obviously
> there's no statutory minimum notice period for this but you probably
> need at least 6-8 weeks to avoid a large number of diary clashes.

Agreed. Do we have a place to meet for those dates?

Philip


> 
> p.
> 
> On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 09:49 -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
>> From Mickey's earlier email:
>>
>> We have proposed three weekends. If anyone of you could open a doodle for
>> that, I'd be grateful:
>>
>> * 12/13 Sept.
>> * 17/18 Oct.
>> * 7/8 Nov.
>>
>> I don't like the September weekend :) (but airfare is still OK)
>>
>> For the other two weekends, airfare from .us is not great, but not 
>> ridiculous either.
>>
>> The October data is designed for people who may come from .us for ELC 
>> Europe (http://www.embeddedlinuxconference.com/elc_europe09/), so a 
>> location "near" Grenoble would be helpful. Anyone have any ideas on that?
>>
>> For November I would assume Berlin.
>>
>> Thoughts? Any other weekends that would work well for people?
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> 

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3303 bytes --]