Re: OEDEM scheduling

[Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>]

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:37:19PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 21:43 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 07:27:48AM -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
> > > Phil Blundell wrote:
> > >> The November date had 100% approval among those who responded to the
> > >> doodle poll.  (October was second best; September was least favoured,
> > >> and in any case the proposed September date is only four weeks away
> > >> which is probably too close for a lot of folks.)  So, I would suggest
> > >> that we just go ahead with the November date rather than introducing new
> > >> alternatives at this stage. Either way, it'd be good to try to get the 
> > >> date nailed down within the
> > >> next week or two so that everyone has adequate notice.  Obviously
> > >> there's no statutory minimum notice period for this but you probably
> > >> need at least 6-8 weeks to avoid a large number of diary clashes.
> > >
> > > Agreed. Do we have a place to meet for those dates?
> > 
> > Any updates on this item?
> 
> I think the original proposal was for either Berlin or Frankfurt.
> Failing that I could probably arrange to host something in Cambridge so
> long as the number of attendees isn't too enormous.

I was trying to find out about the actual place, rather than location... :)

-- 
Denys