OEDEM scheduling

OEDEM scheduling

[Philip Balister]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 666 bytes --]

 From Mickey's earlier email:

We have proposed three weekends. If anyone of you could open a doodle for
that, I'd be grateful:

* 12/13 Sept.
* 17/18 Oct.
* 7/8 Nov.

I don't like the September weekend :) (but airfare is still OK)

For the other two weekends, airfare from .us is not great, but not 
ridiculous either.

The October data is designed for people who may come from .us for ELC 
Europe (http://www.embeddedlinuxconference.com/elc_europe09/), so a 
location "near" Grenoble would be helpful. Anyone have any ideas on that?

For November I would assume Berlin.

Thoughts? Any other weekends that would work well for people?

Philip

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3303 bytes --]

Re: OEDEM scheduling

[Marcin Juszkiewicz]

Dnia sobota, 8 sierpnia 2009 o 15:49:01 Philip Balister napisał(a):

> We have proposed three weekends. If anyone of you could open a doodle
> for that, I'd be grateful:

> * 12/13 Sept.
> * 17/18 Oct.
> * 7/8 Nov.


> The October data is designed for people who may come from .us for ELC
> Europe (http://www.embeddedlinuxconference.com/elc_europe09/), so a
> location "near" Grenoble would be helpful. Anyone have any ideas on
> that?

I will attend ELC (will talk about hacking with OpenEmbedded) but as I 
already bought return tickets I prefer Berlin for OEDEM in October.

> For November I would assume Berlin.

Berlin would be great D:

Regards, 
-- 
JID:      hrw@jabber.org
Website:  http://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcinjuszkiewicz

Re: OEDEM scheduling

[Phil Blundell]

The November date had 100% approval among those who responded to the
doodle poll.  (October was second best; September was least favoured,
and in any case the proposed September date is only four weeks away
which is probably too close for a lot of folks.)  So, I would suggest
that we just go ahead with the November date rather than introducing new
alternatives at this stage. 

Either way, it'd be good to try to get the date nailed down within the
next week or two so that everyone has adequate notice.  Obviously
there's no statutory minimum notice period for this but you probably
need at least 6-8 weeks to avoid a large number of diary clashes.

p.

On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 09:49 -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
> From Mickey's earlier email:
> 
> We have proposed three weekends. If anyone of you could open a doodle for
> that, I'd be grateful:
> 
> * 12/13 Sept.
> * 17/18 Oct.
> * 7/8 Nov.
> 
> I don't like the September weekend :) (but airfare is still OK)
> 
> For the other two weekends, airfare from .us is not great, but not 
> ridiculous either.
> 
> The October data is designed for people who may come from .us for ELC 
> Europe (http://www.embeddedlinuxconference.com/elc_europe09/), so a 
> location "near" Grenoble would be helpful. Anyone have any ideas on that?
> 
> For November I would assume Berlin.
> 
> Thoughts? Any other weekends that would work well for people?

Re: OEDEM scheduling

[Philip Balister]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1783 bytes --]

Phil Blundell wrote:
> The November date had 100% approval among those who responded to the
> doodle poll.  (October was second best; September was least favoured,
> and in any case the proposed September date is only four weeks away
> which is probably too close for a lot of folks.)  So, I would suggest
> that we just go ahead with the November date rather than introducing new
> alternatives at this stage. 
> 
> Either way, it'd be good to try to get the date nailed down within the
> next week or two so that everyone has adequate notice.  Obviously
> there's no statutory minimum notice period for this but you probably
> need at least 6-8 weeks to avoid a large number of diary clashes.

Agreed. Do we have a place to meet for those dates?

Philip


> 
> p.
> 
> On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 09:49 -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
>> From Mickey's earlier email:
>>
>> We have proposed three weekends. If anyone of you could open a doodle for
>> that, I'd be grateful:
>>
>> * 12/13 Sept.
>> * 17/18 Oct.
>> * 7/8 Nov.
>>
>> I don't like the September weekend :) (but airfare is still OK)
>>
>> For the other two weekends, airfare from .us is not great, but not 
>> ridiculous either.
>>
>> The October data is designed for people who may come from .us for ELC 
>> Europe (http://www.embeddedlinuxconference.com/elc_europe09/), so a 
>> location "near" Grenoble would be helpful. Anyone have any ideas on that?
>>
>> For November I would assume Berlin.
>>
>> Thoughts? Any other weekends that would work well for people?
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> 

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3303 bytes --]

Re: OEDEM scheduling

[Denys Dmytriyenko]

On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 07:27:48AM -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
> Phil Blundell wrote:
>> The November date had 100% approval among those who responded to the
>> doodle poll.  (October was second best; September was least favoured,
>> and in any case the proposed September date is only four weeks away
>> which is probably too close for a lot of folks.)  So, I would suggest
>> that we just go ahead with the November date rather than introducing new
>> alternatives at this stage. Either way, it'd be good to try to get the 
>> date nailed down within the
>> next week or two so that everyone has adequate notice.  Obviously
>> there's no statutory minimum notice period for this but you probably
>> need at least 6-8 weeks to avoid a large number of diary clashes.
>
> Agreed. Do we have a place to meet for those dates?

Any updates on this item?

-- 
Denys

Re: OEDEM scheduling

[Phil Blundell]

On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 21:43 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 07:27:48AM -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
> > Phil Blundell wrote:
> >> The November date had 100% approval among those who responded to the
> >> doodle poll.  (October was second best; September was least favoured,
> >> and in any case the proposed September date is only four weeks away
> >> which is probably too close for a lot of folks.)  So, I would suggest
> >> that we just go ahead with the November date rather than introducing new
> >> alternatives at this stage. Either way, it'd be good to try to get the 
> >> date nailed down within the
> >> next week or two so that everyone has adequate notice.  Obviously
> >> there's no statutory minimum notice period for this but you probably
> >> need at least 6-8 weeks to avoid a large number of diary clashes.
> >
> > Agreed. Do we have a place to meet for those dates?
> 
> Any updates on this item?

I think the original proposal was for either Berlin or Frankfurt.
Failing that I could probably arrange to host something in Cambridge so
long as the number of attendees isn't too enormous.

p.

Re: OEDEM scheduling

[Denys Dmytriyenko]

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:37:19PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 21:43 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 07:27:48AM -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
> > > Phil Blundell wrote:
> > >> The November date had 100% approval among those who responded to the
> > >> doodle poll.  (October was second best; September was least favoured,
> > >> and in any case the proposed September date is only four weeks away
> > >> which is probably too close for a lot of folks.)  So, I would suggest
> > >> that we just go ahead with the November date rather than introducing new
> > >> alternatives at this stage. Either way, it'd be good to try to get the 
> > >> date nailed down within the
> > >> next week or two so that everyone has adequate notice.  Obviously
> > >> there's no statutory minimum notice period for this but you probably
> > >> need at least 6-8 weeks to avoid a large number of diary clashes.
> > >
> > > Agreed. Do we have a place to meet for those dates?
> > 
> > Any updates on this item?
> 
> I think the original proposal was for either Berlin or Frankfurt.
> Failing that I could probably arrange to host something in Cambridge so
> long as the number of attendees isn't too enormous.

I was trying to find out about the actual place, rather than location... :)

-- 
Denys