All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
To: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-v2 2/2] Initialize mempool and elevator only for request-based dm devices
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:06:24 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A812680.7040804@ct.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200908101618.21060.knikanth@suse.de>

Hi Nikanth,

On 08/10/2009 07:48 PM +0900, Nikanth Karthikesan wrote:
> Intialize the request_queue and elevator only when the device is marked as
> a request-based device. This avoids unnecessary creation of mempool for
> requests. Also we wrongly initialize the elevator even for bio-based devices.
> As the /sys/block/dm-*/queue/scheduler is exported for device-mapper devices,
> it is possible to confuse with scheduler options for bio-based devices where
> scheduler is not at all used.

Thank you for working on this.
Actually, I had tried this delayed allocation thing before,
but I chose the current implementation since I couldn't solve
some problems, which your patch also has.
Please see my comment below.


> @@ -2203,6 +2199,25 @@ int dm_swap_table(struct mapped_device *md, struct dm_table *table)
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* new device is being marked as request-based */
> +	if (!md->map && dm_table_request_based(table)) {
> +		/* initialize queue for request-based dm */
> +		r = blk_init_allocated_queue(md->queue, dm_request_fn, NULL);
> +		if (r)
> +			goto out;

Generally, dm must not allocate memory during resume because
it may cause a deadlock in no memory situation.
However, there is no I/O on this device at this point,
so the allocation should be ok for this special case.
I think some comments are needed here to describe that.


> +
> +		/*
> +		 * reinitialize make_request_fn as it was reset to the
> +		 * default __make_request by blk_init_allocate_queue
> +		 */
> +		md->saved_make_request_fn = md->queue->make_request_fn;
> +		blk_queue_make_request(md->queue, dm_request);
> +
> +		blk_queue_softirq_done(md->queue, dm_softirq_done);
> +		blk_queue_prep_rq(md->queue, dm_prep_fn);
> +		blk_queue_lld_busy(md->queue, dm_lld_busy);
> +	}
> +
>  	__unbind(md);
>  	r = __bind(md, table, &limits);

The queue has been registered at the device creation time by
add_disk() in alloc_dev().
Since the queue is reconfigured (elevator is attached), you have to
update the queue registration (e.g. unregister, then re-register).
But it may not be easy.  At least, there is no exported interface to
unregister/re-register queue.

Thanks,
Kiyoshi Ueda

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
To: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-v2 2/2] Initialize mempool and elevator only for request-based dm devices
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:06:24 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A812680.7040804@ct.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200908101618.21060.knikanth@suse.de>

Hi Nikanth,

On 08/10/2009 07:48 PM +0900, Nikanth Karthikesan wrote:
> Intialize the request_queue and elevator only when the device is marked as
> a request-based device. This avoids unnecessary creation of mempool for
> requests. Also we wrongly initialize the elevator even for bio-based devices.
> As the /sys/block/dm-*/queue/scheduler is exported for device-mapper devices,
> it is possible to confuse with scheduler options for bio-based devices where
> scheduler is not at all used.

Thank you for working on this.
Actually, I had tried this delayed allocation thing before,
but I chose the current implementation since I couldn't solve
some problems, which your patch also has.
Please see my comment below.


> @@ -2203,6 +2199,25 @@ int dm_swap_table(struct mapped_device *md, struct dm_table *table)
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* new device is being marked as request-based */
> +	if (!md->map && dm_table_request_based(table)) {
> +		/* initialize queue for request-based dm */
> +		r = blk_init_allocated_queue(md->queue, dm_request_fn, NULL);
> +		if (r)
> +			goto out;

Generally, dm must not allocate memory during resume because
it may cause a deadlock in no memory situation.
However, there is no I/O on this device at this point,
so the allocation should be ok for this special case.
I think some comments are needed here to describe that.


> +
> +		/*
> +		 * reinitialize make_request_fn as it was reset to the
> +		 * default __make_request by blk_init_allocate_queue
> +		 */
> +		md->saved_make_request_fn = md->queue->make_request_fn;
> +		blk_queue_make_request(md->queue, dm_request);
> +
> +		blk_queue_softirq_done(md->queue, dm_softirq_done);
> +		blk_queue_prep_rq(md->queue, dm_prep_fn);
> +		blk_queue_lld_busy(md->queue, dm_lld_busy);
> +	}
> +
>  	__unbind(md);
>  	r = __bind(md, table, &limits);

The queue has been registered at the device creation time by
add_disk() in alloc_dev().
Since the queue is reconfigured (elevator is attached), you have to
update the queue registration (e.g. unregister, then re-register).
But it may not be easy.  At least, there is no exported interface to
unregister/re-register queue.

Thanks,
Kiyoshi Ueda

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-11  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-08  4:56 [PATCH 2/2] Initialize mempool and elevator only for request-based dm devices Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-08  4:56 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-08 16:21 ` Mike Snitzer
2009-08-08 16:21   ` Mike Snitzer
2009-08-10 10:21   ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-10 10:48     ` [PATCH-v2 " Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-11  8:06       ` Kiyoshi Ueda [this message]
2009-08-11  8:06         ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-08-11  9:05         ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-11  9:05           ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-11  9:32           ` [PATCH-v3 " Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-11  9:32             ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-12  2:15           ` [PATCH-v2 " Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-08-12  2:15             ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-08-12  8:47             ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-12  8:47               ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-14  7:01               ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-08-14  7:01                 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-11 16:23                 ` Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A812680.7040804@ct.jp.nec.com \
    --to=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=knikanth@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.