From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 2.6.31-rc5 REPOST] percpu, sparc64: fix sparse possible
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:26:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A84E766.3070904@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090812.162517.13032565.davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller wrote:
> From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:10:29 +0900
>
>> Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>> for the x86 bits:
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>>>>
>>>> Once Dave acks it i suspect you can send it to Linus directly?
>> Aieeeee, no response.
>
> These patches look fine, and I've tested them also on my
> Niagara-2 box.
>
> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
>
> Sorry for the delay :)
Great. Oops, last review pass revealed a bug in the following chunk.
@@ -1259,9 +1259,16 @@ ssize_t __init pcpu_embed_first_chunk(size_t static_size, size_t reserved_size,
}
/* return the leftover and copy */
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++) {
void *ptr = pcpue_ptr + cpu * pcpue_unit_size;
+ if (cpu_possible(cpu)) {
+ free_bootmem(__pa(ptr + pcpue_size),
+ pcpue_unit_size - pcpue_size);
+ memcpy(ptr, __per_cpu_load, static_size);
+ } else
+ free_bootmem(__pa(ptr), pcpue_unit_size);
+
free_bootmem(__pa(ptr + pcpue_size),
pcpue_unit_size - pcpue_size);
memcpy(ptr, __per_cpu_load, static_size);
The if-else block should replace the original free_bootmem()/memcpy()
not added in front of it. Fixed. Will reply with updated patch.
Thanks.
--
tejun
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 2.6.31-rc5 REPOST] percpu, sparc64: fix sparse possible cpu map handling
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:26:14 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A84E766.3070904@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090812.162517.13032565.davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller wrote:
> From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:10:29 +0900
>
>> Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>> for the x86 bits:
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>>>>
>>>> Once Dave acks it i suspect you can send it to Linus directly?
>> Aieeeee, no response.
>
> These patches look fine, and I've tested them also on my
> Niagara-2 box.
>
> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
>
> Sorry for the delay :)
Great. Oops, last review pass revealed a bug in the following chunk.
@@ -1259,9 +1259,16 @@ ssize_t __init pcpu_embed_first_chunk(size_t static_size, size_t reserved_size,
}
/* return the leftover and copy */
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++) {
void *ptr = pcpue_ptr + cpu * pcpue_unit_size;
+ if (cpu_possible(cpu)) {
+ free_bootmem(__pa(ptr + pcpue_size),
+ pcpue_unit_size - pcpue_size);
+ memcpy(ptr, __per_cpu_load, static_size);
+ } else
+ free_bootmem(__pa(ptr), pcpue_unit_size);
+
free_bootmem(__pa(ptr + pcpue_size),
pcpue_unit_size - pcpue_size);
memcpy(ptr, __per_cpu_load, static_size);
The if-else block should replace the original free_bootmem()/memcpy()
not added in front of it. Fixed. Will reply with updated patch.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-14 4:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-06 9:33 [PATCH 1/2 2.6.31-rc5 REPOST] init: set nr_cpu_ids before setup_per_cpu_areas() Tejun Heo
2009-08-06 9:33 ` Tejun Heo
2009-08-06 9:36 ` [PATCH 2/2 2.6.31-rc5 REPOST] percpu, sparc64: fix sparse possible Tejun Heo
2009-08-06 9:36 ` [PATCH 2/2 2.6.31-rc5 REPOST] percpu, sparc64: fix sparse possible cpu map handling Tejun Heo
2009-08-06 11:57 ` [PATCH 2/2 2.6.31-rc5 REPOST] percpu, sparc64: fix sparse Ingo Molnar
2009-08-06 11:57 ` [PATCH 2/2 2.6.31-rc5 REPOST] percpu, sparc64: fix sparse possible cpu map handling Ingo Molnar
2009-08-06 16:15 ` [PATCH 2/2 2.6.31-rc5 REPOST] percpu, sparc64: fix sparse possible Tejun Heo
2009-08-06 16:15 ` [PATCH 2/2 2.6.31-rc5 REPOST] percpu, sparc64: fix sparse possible cpu map handling Tejun Heo
2009-08-12 6:10 ` [PATCH 2/2 2.6.31-rc5 REPOST] percpu, sparc64: fix sparse possible Tejun Heo
2009-08-12 6:10 ` [PATCH 2/2 2.6.31-rc5 REPOST] percpu, sparc64: fix sparse possible cpu map handling Tejun Heo
2009-08-12 23:25 ` [PATCH 2/2 2.6.31-rc5 REPOST] percpu, sparc64: fix sparse David Miller
2009-08-12 23:25 ` [PATCH 2/2 2.6.31-rc5 REPOST] percpu, sparc64: fix sparse possible cpu map handling David Miller
2009-08-14 4:26 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-08-14 4:26 ` Tejun Heo
2009-08-14 4:27 ` [PATCH 2/2 2.6.31-rc5 UPDATED] percpu, sparc64: fix sparse possible Tejun Heo
2009-08-14 4:27 ` [PATCH 2/2 2.6.31-rc5 UPDATED] percpu, sparc64: fix sparse possible cpu map handling Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A84E766.3070904@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.