Re: [XCI] Mesa build problem

[Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@eu.citrix.com>]

Daniel Barden wrote:
> Hi,
>
>       While building Mesa library in Xenclient, I got the following 
> problems:
>
> touch 
> depend                                                                                                                                          
>
> makedepend -I 
> -I/home/dbarden/work/XCI/build_i686/staging_dir/usr/include/linux 
> -fdepend -I. -I../../../include -I../../../include/GL/internal 
> -I../../../src/mesa/main -I../../../src/mesa/glapi `pkg-config 
> --cflags libdrm`  glcontextmodes.c clientattrib.c compsize.c eval.c 
> glxcmds.c glxcurrent.c glxext.c glxextensions.c indirect.c 
> indirect_init.c indirect_size.c indirect_window_pos.c 
> indirect_texture_compression.c indirect_transpose_matrix.c 
> indirect_vertex_array.c indirect_vertex_program.c pixel.c pixelstore.c 
> render2.c renderpix.c single2.c singlepix.c vertarr.c xfont.c 
> glx_pbuffer.c glx_query.c drisw_glx.c dri_common.c dri_glx.c XF86dri.c 
> glxhash.c 
> \                                                                                         
>
>                 ../../../src/mesa/main/dispatch.c 
> ../../../src/mesa/glapi/glapi.c ../../../src/mesa/glapi/glthread.c 
> ../../../src/mesa/x86/glapi_x86.S                                                                                                                                                      
>
> makedepend: warning:  glcontextmodes.c (reading 
> /usr/include/sys/types.h, line 147): cannot find include file 
> "stddef.h"                             
>         not in 
> -I/home/dbarden/work/XCI/build_i686/staging_dir/usr/include/linux/stddef.h                                                             
>
>         not in 
> ./stddef.h                                                                                                                             
>
>         not in ../../../include/stddef.h  
>
> In the makedepend line, there is a -I without any directory, that 
> causes the next -I to be considered a directory. Does any of you have 
> the same problem?
I'm afraid nobody actually needed mesa in dom0 in the first place, but 
you could try newer buildroot, to see if the compilation actually worked 
there, and tell us; or even better, send backporting patches ;)

-- 
Vincent