All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/1] Make the e1000 the default network adapter for the pc target.
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:57:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A95070A.4060906@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ab1nir24.fsf_-_@nemi.mork.no>

On 08/25/2009 11:20 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com>  writes:
>    
>> On 08/25/2009 04:23 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>>
>>      
>>> I use e1000 with win xp, although win xp has no driver at all for the
>>> e1000 and requires you to download the intel driver and install that.
>>> The intel driver also made win 2003 work before even though the microsoft
>>> supplied driver did not work.
>>>        
>> Ok.  IMO it's important for networking to work out of the box, so we
>> should avoid e1000 as default.
>>      
> I don't think you can buy a new PC with a NIC supported out of the box
> by Windows XP.

rtl8139 works out of the box.

> That doesn't seem to bother the PC manufacturers...
>    

I'm sure it bothers users.

> The e1000 works very well in Windows XP, given that you install the
> driver from Intel.  And e1000 is certainly more common and better
> supported than ne2k in more *modern* OSes.
>
> I fully agree with Anthony:
>   "the average user is better served with an e1000 vs ne2k."
>
> But this of course boils down to a discussion about who the average user
> is.  Anyone having any statistics on that?
>
> Anyway, most people will know that they may need driver disks when
> installing ancient OSes on modern computers.  With QEMU they even have
> the option to change the hardware with a flip of a command line.
>
> The ne2k default is misleading.  A common assumption is that developers
> know best, and that you need a good reason to change their defaults.
> This may trick people into thinking that the ne2k is the best NIC choice
> for QEMU. And I think everyone here agrees that it is not anymore.
>    

The best choice for Windows XP is virtio, but we sure won't be making 
that the default.  Given that e1000 gives 0 Mb/sec out of the box, I 
think it's clear that rtl8139 is better.  If people are interested in 
performance, they can change the default and download a driver (e1000 or 
virtio).

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-26  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-14 16:23 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] Make the e1000 the default network adapter for the pc target Anthony Liguori
2009-08-15 21:58 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/1] Make the e1000 the default network adapterfor " Sebastian Herbszt
2009-08-17 10:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] Make the e1000 the default network adapter for " Mark McLoughlin
2009-08-24 15:12   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-24 15:36     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-24 16:14       ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-25 10:45 ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-25 12:39   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-25 15:55     ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-25 13:23   ` Lennart Sorensen
2009-08-25 13:34     ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-25 14:23       ` Lennart Sorensen
2009-08-25 16:00       ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-25 15:58     ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-25 16:30       ` Lennart Sorensen
2009-08-25 16:39         ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-25 16:56           ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-25 17:11             ` Lennart Sorensen
2009-08-25 17:13               ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-25 18:19                 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-26  8:32                   ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-25 17:28               ` Reimar Döffinger
2009-08-26  5:47           ` Amit Shah
2009-08-25 20:20       ` [Qemu-devel] " Bjørn Mork
2009-08-26  9:57         ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-08-25 13:51   ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Weil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A95070A.4060906@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=bjorn@mork.no \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.