From: Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
'Anton Vorontsov' <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"'linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
'Neil Horman' <nhorman@redhat.com>,
"'Eric W. Biederman'" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"'kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com'"
<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
'Andi Kleen' <andi@firstfloor.org>,
'Michael Ellerman' <michael@ellerman.id.au>,
"'M. Mohan Kumar'" <mohan@in.ibm.com>,
"'akpm@linux-foundation.org'" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"'bernhard.walle@gmx.de'" <bernhard.walle@gmx.de>,
'Ingo Molnar' <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [Patch 4/8] ia64: implement crashkernel=auto
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:04:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A97ABA9.8030604@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A6AD88C3F2289247BE726C37303E1EB8B949E7A3@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
Yu, Fenghua wrote:
>>>> + unsigned long long ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (total_size >= GBYTES(4) && total_size < GBYTES(12))
>>>> + ret = MBYTES(256);
>>>> + else if (total_size >= GBYTES(12) && total_size < GBYTES(128))
>>>> + ret = MBYTES(512);
>>>> + else if (total_size >= GBYTES(128) && total_size < GBYTES(256))
>>>> + ret = MBYTES(768);
>>>> + else if (total_size >= GBYTES(256) && total_size < GBYTES(378))
>>>> + ret = MBYTES(1024);
>>>> + else if (total_size >= GBYTES(318) && total_size < GBYTES(512))
>>>> + ret = MBYTES(1536);
>>>> + else if (total_size >= GBYTES(512) && total_size < GBYTES(768))
>>>> + ret = MBYTES(2048);
>>>> + else
>>>> + ret = MBYTES(3072);
>>>> + if (!ia64_platform_is("sn2") && !ia64_platform_is("uv"))
>>>> + if (ret > GBYTES(4))
>>>> + ret = ret / GBYTES(4) * MBYTES(256);
>>>>
>>>>
>>> This code doesn't make sense to me. What you really want is following
>>>
>> code, right?
>>
>>> + if (total_size > GBYTES(4))
>>> + ret = total_size / GBYTES(4) * MBYTEST(256)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Nope. Check check_crashkernel_memory().
>>
>
> This statement will be ALWAYS false:
> + if (ret > GBYTES(4))
> since ret's max value is 3GB after the above total_size checks.
>
> So the code doesn't make sense. Did I miss something?
>
Oops, in fact it was supposed to be:
if (ret + base > GBYTES(4))
//blah blah
Hmm, but is it possible for ia64 to choose a base address above 1G? If
no, that code can be removed.
Thanks!
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"'Anton Vorontsov'" <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"'linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
"'Neil Horman'" <nhorman@redhat.com>,
"'Eric W. Biederman'" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"'kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com'"
<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"'Andi Kleen'" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"'Michael Ellerman'" <michael@ellerman.id.au>,
"'M. Mohan Kumar'" <mohan@in.ibm.com>,
"'akpm@linux-foundation.org'" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"'bernhard.walle@gmx.de'" <bernhard.walle@gmx.de>,
"'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [Patch 4/8] ia64: implement crashkernel=auto
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:04:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A97ABA9.8030604@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A6AD88C3F2289247BE726C37303E1EB8B949E7A3@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
Yu, Fenghua wrote:
>>>> + unsigned long long ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (total_size >= GBYTES(4) && total_size < GBYTES(12))
>>>> + ret = MBYTES(256);
>>>> + else if (total_size >= GBYTES(12) && total_size < GBYTES(128))
>>>> + ret = MBYTES(512);
>>>> + else if (total_size >= GBYTES(128) && total_size < GBYTES(256))
>>>> + ret = MBYTES(768);
>>>> + else if (total_size >= GBYTES(256) && total_size < GBYTES(378))
>>>> + ret = MBYTES(1024);
>>>> + else if (total_size >= GBYTES(318) && total_size < GBYTES(512))
>>>> + ret = MBYTES(1536);
>>>> + else if (total_size >= GBYTES(512) && total_size < GBYTES(768))
>>>> + ret = MBYTES(2048);
>>>> + else
>>>> + ret = MBYTES(3072);
>>>> + if (!ia64_platform_is("sn2") && !ia64_platform_is("uv"))
>>>> + if (ret > GBYTES(4))
>>>> + ret = ret / GBYTES(4) * MBYTES(256);
>>>>
>>>>
>>> This code doesn't make sense to me. What you really want is following
>>>
>> code, right?
>>
>>> + if (total_size > GBYTES(4))
>>> + ret = total_size / GBYTES(4) * MBYTEST(256)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Nope. Check check_crashkernel_memory().
>>
>
> This statement will be ALWAYS false:
> + if (ret > GBYTES(4))
> since ret's max value is 3GB after the above total_size checks.
>
> So the code doesn't make sense. Did I miss something?
>
Oops, in fact it was supposed to be:
if (ret + base > GBYTES(4))
//blah blah
Hmm, but is it possible for ia64 to choose a base address above 1G? If
no, that code can be removed.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-28 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-27 3:15 [Patch 0/8] V5 Implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 3:15 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 3:15 ` [Patch 1/8] x86: add CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 3:15 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 3:15 ` [Patch 2/8] x86: implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 3:15 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 3:16 ` [Patch 3/8] ia64: add CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 3:16 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 3:16 ` [Patch 4/8] ia64: implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 3:16 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 4:19 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-08-27 4:19 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-08-27 10:26 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 10:26 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 18:13 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-08-27 18:13 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-08-28 10:04 ` Amerigo Wang [this message]
2009-08-28 10:04 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-28 20:08 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-08-28 20:08 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-08-27 3:16 ` [Patch 5/8] powerpc: add CONFIG_KEXEC_AUTO_RESERVE Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 3:16 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 3:16 ` [Patch 6/8] powerpc: implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 3:16 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 18:22 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-08-27 18:22 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-08-27 3:16 ` [Patch 7/8] doc: update the kdump document Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 3:16 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 3:17 ` [Patch 8/8] kexec: allow to shrink reserved memory Amerigo Wang
2009-08-27 3:17 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-31 0:54 ` [Patch 0/8] V5 Implement crashkernel=auto Michael Ellerman
2009-08-31 0:54 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-08-31 3:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-31 3:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-08-31 3:25 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-31 3:25 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-31 3:27 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-31 3:27 ` Amerigo Wang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-04 10:08 [Patch 0/8] V6 " Amerigo Wang
2009-09-04 10:09 ` [Patch 4/8] ia64: implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-09-04 10:09 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-12 8:15 [Patch 0/8] V3 Implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-12 8:15 ` [Patch 4/8] ia64: implement crashkernel=auto Amerigo Wang
2009-08-12 8:15 ` Amerigo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A97ABA9.8030604@redhat.com \
--to=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=bernhard.walle@gmx.de \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mohan@in.ibm.com \
--cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.