[refpolicy] apps_wine.patch

[refpolicy] apps_wine.patch

[Daniel J Walsh]

http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F12/apps_wine.patch

Lots of new paths for wine,   As well as some new allow rules.

[refpolicy] apps_wine.patch

[Daniel J Walsh]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F14/apps_wine.patch

Add label for wine_home
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkx27jMACgkQrlYvE4MpobPGMwCgib83shOnjBTxZG39+6YKqBcI
vMYAmwbZFSLToP9QoUXhtkzLBbxdyvEb
=7pVK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[refpolicy] apps_wine.patch

[Daniel J Walsh]

http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F14/apps_wine.patch

Picasa ships wine execs.

wine changes fro domain_mmap_low

[refpolicy] apps_wine.patch

[Christopher J. PeBenito]

On 06/02/10 16:16, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F14/apps_wine.patch
>
> Picasa ships wine execs.
>
> wine changes fro domain_mmap_low

This last part confuses me.  I thought mmap_low was intrinsically 
required for wine.  Neglecting that question, there seems to be an error 
in the .if:

> +	tunable_policy(`wine_mmap_zero_ignore',`
> +		allow $1_wine_t self:memprotect mmap_zero;
> +	')

Shouldn't this be dontaudited?

This doesn't seem to make sense.  Aren't the subject and object 
reversed?  Also it seems odd, since wine is running Windows programs, 
which wouldn't really inherit things from the Linux environment:

> +	# Unrestricted inheritance from the caller.
> +	allow $2 wine_t:process { noatsecure siginh rlimitinh };


-- 
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com

[refpolicy] apps_wine.patch

[Daniel J Walsh]

On 07/06/2010 11:42 AM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> On 06/02/10 16:16, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F14/apps_wine.patch
>>
>> Picasa ships wine execs.
>>
>> wine changes fro domain_mmap_low
> 
> This last part confuses me.  I thought mmap_low was intrinsically
> required for wine.  Neglecting that question, there seems to be an error
> in the .if:
> 
It is only required by wine if you run old DOS 16 bit apps or badly
written ones. Newer Windows apps should not require this.
>> +    tunable_policy(`wine_mmap_zero_ignore',`
>> +        allow $1_wine_t self:memprotect mmap_zero;
>> +    ')
> 
> Shouldn't this be dontaudited?
> 
Yes.
> This doesn't seem to make sense.  Aren't the subject and object
> reversed?  Also it seems odd, since wine is running Windows programs,
> which wouldn't really inherit things from the Linux environment:
> 
>> +    # Unrestricted inheritance from the caller.
>> +    allow $2 wine_t:process { noatsecure siginh rlimitinh };
> 
> 

I have no idea why this was added.   I guess we can remove it and see if
it is rereported.

[refpolicy] apps_wine.patch

[Daniel J Walsh]

http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F12/apps_wine.patch

Latest wine policy to be used with confined domains.

[refpolicy] apps_wine.patch

[Christopher J. PeBenito]

On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 15:55 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F12/apps_wine.patch
> 
> Latest wine policy to be used with confined domains.

Merged.

-- 
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
(410) 290-1411 x150

[refpolicy] apps_wine.patch

[Daniel J Walsh]

http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F11/apps_wine.patch

Wine policy see java, mono, execmem.

[refpolicy] apps_wine.patch

[Daniel J Walsh]

http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F11/apps_wine.patch

Lots of new file context for wine.  Need to make sure all hard links 
have same file context

Added wine role interface

wine uses domain_mmap_log

wine interacts with the xserver

[refpolicy] apps_wine.patch

[Daniel J Walsh]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F11/apps_wine.patch

Additional file context for wine apps

wine mmap low memory.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkmv+5UACgkQrlYvE4MpobMlDwCfRGg/NoDA+tsx+b89mtPLaUvg
rR0Anjqcj9HkiAoiX4uEb6C5nOYRQaER
=eSAe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----