From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Odd value for I2C_TIMEOUT in fsl_i2c.c
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 10:22:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A9FDF1E.4090908@freescale.com> (raw)
Currently we define I2C_TIMEOUT like this:
#define I2C_TIMEOUT (CONFIG_SYS_HZ / 4)
I'm seeing some I2C instability on a new board I'm working on, especially with SPD. If I change the above to
#define I2C_TIMEOUT (CONFIG_SYS_HZ / 2)
The problems go away (or at least, so far appear to). Can someone tell me why we choose (CONFIG_SYS_HZ / 4) to begin with? The way we use I2C_TIMEOUT is confusing:
while (readb(&i2c_dev[i2c_bus_num]->sr) & I2C_SR_MBB) {
if ((get_ticks() - timeval) > usec2ticks(I2C_TIMEOUT))
return -1;
}
CONFIG_HZ is 1000, so I2C_TIMEOUT is equal to 250. However, the way it's used, 250 isn't the number of ticks per second, it's used as number of microseconds. If CONFIG_HZ is changed to 100, does that mean that we want to call usec2ticks(25)?
I think what we should be doing is this:
#define I2C_TIMEOUT 1000
Surely, one millisecond is not too long of a timeout?
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
next reply other threads:[~2009-09-03 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-03 15:22 Timur Tabi [this message]
2009-09-04 7:16 ` [U-Boot] Odd value for I2C_TIMEOUT in fsl_i2c.c Heiko Schocher
2009-09-04 9:25 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-04 14:09 ` Timur Tabi
2009-09-04 15:01 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-04 15:12 ` Timur Tabi
2009-09-04 15:28 ` Peter Tyser
2009-09-04 15:30 ` Timur Tabi
2009-09-04 16:04 ` Peter Tyser
2009-09-04 18:30 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-04 18:39 ` Timur Tabi
2009-09-04 19:28 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-04 18:28 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-04 15:29 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-04 18:34 ` Scott Wood
2009-09-04 19:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-04 19:28 ` Scott Wood
2009-09-04 8:31 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-04 18:36 ` Scott Wood
2009-09-04 19:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A9FDF1E.4090908@freescale.com \
--to=timur@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.