From: Jerry Van Baren <gerald.vanbaren@ge.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI DaVinci: Remove references to SZ_xx
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:07:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AA6B98B.2040502@ge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17434f2e0909081228g626feae2s1bac3bbcedabd2c6@mail.gmail.com>
J.C. Wren wrote:
> I saw this comment: "Also i gather from e-mails on the list that Wolfgang
> does not like these references to "SZ_xx". Maybe that discussion took place
> before I joined the list.
>
> If he wants it that way, fine. But that doesn't explain the "why". What's
> so offensive about the SZ_* defines?
>
> --jc
Hi J.C.,
The SZ_* defines turns a simple math problem into a two finger
problem... every time you see them, you need to put your finger in the
code and look them up, only to find (1 << n), have to stick a second
finger in the code, and have to do the math anyway.
One REALLY BAD problem is that idiots have been known to mis-define them
rather than fix the code that uses them (seriously!). By using (1 <<
20) directly, it removes that temptation.
A lesser problem is that they don't do anything, you still have to
figure out that 1 << 20 is 1MiB. All they do is defer the pain.
You will also find other silliness, e.g. generating SZ_31M:
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/27048/focus=27139>
This silliness is the road to insanity: SZ_30M and SZ_29M and
SZ_28.125M. (OK, I exaggerated on that last one. It would actually be
SZ_28_125M.)
HTH,
gvb
[snip]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-08 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-08 18:24 [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI DaVinci: Remove references to SZ_xx s-paulraj at ti.com
2009-09-08 18:50 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-08 18:56 ` Paulraj, Sandeep
2009-09-08 19:04 ` Paulraj, Sandeep
2009-09-08 20:34 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-08 19:09 ` Tom
2009-09-08 19:14 ` J.C. Wren
2009-09-08 19:20 ` Paulraj, Sandeep
2009-09-08 19:28 ` J.C. Wren
2009-09-08 19:38 ` Paulraj, Sandeep
2009-09-08 20:07 ` Jerry Van Baren [this message]
2009-09-08 20:12 ` J.C. Wren
2009-09-08 20:41 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-08 21:13 ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-09-08 21:21 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-09-09 2:45 ` Jerry Van Baren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AA6B98B.2040502@ge.com \
--to=gerald.vanbaren@ge.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.