[U-Boot] [PATCH] TI: DaVinci: DM646x: Update flag used to represent DM646x SOC's

[U-Boot] [PATCH] TI: DaVinci: DM646x: Update flag used to represent DM646x SOC's

[s-paulraj at ti.com]

From: Sandeep Paulraj <s-paulraj@ti.com>

In the DaVinci specific code, we use both CONFIG_SOC_DM646X and
CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to represent DM646x specific code.
This patch changes occurrences of CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to
CONFIG_SOC_DM646X. This is because for DM644x series of SOCs we use
the flag CONFIG_SOC_DM644X. We want some uniformity.

Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj <s-paulraj@ti.com>
---
 include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/emac_defs.h |    4 ++--
 include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/nand_defs.h |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/emac_defs.h b/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/emac_defs.h
index ae75f84..96bc80e 100644
--- a/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/emac_defs.h
+++ b/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/emac_defs.h
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
 #define EMAC_MDIO_BASE_ADDR		(0x01c84000)
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM646x
+#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM646X
 /* MDIO module input frequency */
 #define EMAC_MDIO_BUS_FREQ		76500000
 /* MDIO clock output frequency */
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ typedef struct  {
 
 /* EMAC Wrapper Registers Structure */
 typedef struct  {
-#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_DM646x) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_DM365)
+#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_DM646X) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_DM365)
 	dv_reg		IDVER;
 	dv_reg		SOFTRST;
 	dv_reg		EMCTRL;
diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/nand_defs.h b/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/nand_defs.h
index 386540e..10f3a39 100644
--- a/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/nand_defs.h
+++ b/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/nand_defs.h
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
 
 #include <asm/arch/hardware.h>
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM646x
+#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM646X
 #define	MASK_CLE	0x80000
 #define	MASK_ALE	0x40000
 #else
-- 
1.6.0.4

[U-Boot] [PATCH] TI: DaVinci: DM646x: Update flag used to represent DM646x SOC's

[Tom]

s-paulraj at ti.com wrote:
> From: Sandeep Paulraj <s-paulraj@ti.com>
> 
> In the DaVinci specific code, we use both CONFIG_SOC_DM646X and
> CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to represent DM646x specific code.
> This patch changes occurrences of CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to
> CONFIG_SOC_DM646X. This is because for DM644x series of SOCs we use
> the flag CONFIG_SOC_DM644X. We want some uniformity.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj <s-paulraj@ti.com>

Which board defines CONFIG_SOC_DM646X?
I could not find it in a simple grep.

Otherwise..
Ack-ed
Tom

> ---
>  include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/emac_defs.h |    4 ++--
>  include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/nand_defs.h |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/emac_defs.h b/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/emac_defs.h
> index ae75f84..96bc80e 100644
> --- a/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/emac_defs.h
> +++ b/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/emac_defs.h
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
>  #define EMAC_MDIO_BASE_ADDR		(0x01c84000)
>  #endif
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM646x
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM646X
>  /* MDIO module input frequency */
>  #define EMAC_MDIO_BUS_FREQ		76500000
>  /* MDIO clock output frequency */
> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ typedef struct  {
>  
>  /* EMAC Wrapper Registers Structure */
>  typedef struct  {
> -#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_DM646x) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_DM365)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_DM646X) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_DM365)
>  	dv_reg		IDVER;
>  	dv_reg		SOFTRST;
>  	dv_reg		EMCTRL;
> diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/nand_defs.h b/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/nand_defs.h
> index 386540e..10f3a39 100644
> --- a/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/nand_defs.h
> +++ b/include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/nand_defs.h
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
>  
>  #include <asm/arch/hardware.h>
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM646x
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM646X
>  #define	MASK_CLE	0x80000
>  #define	MASK_ALE	0x40000
>  #else

[U-Boot] [PATCH] TI: DaVinci: DM646x: Update flag used to represent DM646x SOC's

[Paulraj, Sandeep]

> 
> s-paulraj at ti.com wrote:
> > From: Sandeep Paulraj <s-paulraj@ti.com>
> >
> > In the DaVinci specific code, we use both CONFIG_SOC_DM646X and
> > CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to represent DM646x specific code.
> > This patch changes occurrences of CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to
> > CONFIG_SOC_DM646X. This is because for DM644x series of SOCs we use
> > the flag CONFIG_SOC_DM644X. We want some uniformity.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj <s-paulraj@ti.com>
> 
> Which board defines CONFIG_SOC_DM646X?
> I could not find it in a simple grep.
> 
> Otherwise..
> Ack-ed
> Tom

No board uses it as of now. But there is some support for DM646x(DaVinci-HD) based chips in the present source in the form of some entries in the hardware.h file and 1 DM646x SOC specific file.
IIRC patches were sent some months ago for DM646x but got lost in the list.

Thanks,
Sandeep