From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>,
kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>,
Andrzej Zaborowski <balrogg@gmail.com>,
"Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>,
Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, malc <av1474@comtv.ru>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Release plan for 0.12.0
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:45:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AC36F0C.8020400@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090930103001.21aa7a8d@doriath>
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:54:53 -0500
> Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>> I think aiming for early to mid-December would give us roughly a 3 month
>> cycle and would align well with some of the Linux distribution cycles.
>> I'd like to limit things to a single -rc that lasted only for about a
>> week. This is enough time to fix most of the obvious issues I think.
>>
>
> How do you plan to do it? I mean, are you going to create a separate branch
> or make master the -rc?
>
> Creating a separate branch (which is what we do today, iiuc) makes it
> get less attention, freezing master for a certain period is the best
> way to stabilize.
>
> Is this what you had in mind?
>
What do people think?
One reason I branch is because some people care a bit less about
releases so it makes the process non-disruptive to them. If the other
maintainers agreed though, I would certainly like to have the master
branch essentially frozen for the week before the release.
--
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-30 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-29 23:54 Release plan for 0.12.0 Anthony Liguori
2009-09-30 0:20 ` Dustin Kirkland
2009-09-30 2:18 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-30 2:28 ` [Qemu-devel] " Isaku Yamahata
2009-09-30 13:03 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-30 13:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-09-30 5:17 ` Amit Shah
2009-09-30 13:04 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-30 13:37 ` Amit Shah
2009-09-30 14:47 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-30 14:50 ` Amit Shah
2009-09-30 6:41 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2009-09-30 13:05 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-10-01 21:13 ` Luiz Capitulino
2009-10-03 10:04 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-05 12:43 ` Luiz Capitulino
2009-10-05 13:52 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-30 13:31 ` Luiz Capitulino
2009-09-30 8:53 ` Michael Tokarev
2009-09-30 9:01 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-30 9:31 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2009-09-30 13:07 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-30 15:59 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2009-09-30 19:25 ` Blue Swirl
2009-09-30 13:30 ` Luiz Capitulino
2009-09-30 14:45 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-09-30 15:03 ` Fred Leeflang
2009-09-30 15:26 ` [Qemu-devel] " Luiz Capitulino
2009-09-30 17:03 ` Juan Quintela
2009-09-30 19:28 ` [Qemu-devel] " Gerd Hoffmann
2009-10-03 4:28 ` TAKEDA, toshiya
2009-10-08 13:55 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jens Osterkamp
2009-10-08 14:21 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-10-14 13:09 ` [Qemu-devel] " Arnd Bergmann
2009-10-14 13:53 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-10-14 14:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-10-14 14:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-10-14 13:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-10-14 14:17 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-10-14 14:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-10-14 15:19 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jamie Lokier
2009-10-14 15:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-10-14 21:10 ` [Qemu-devel] " Sridhar Samudrala
2009-10-14 22:53 ` Raw vs. tap (was: Re: Re: Release plan for 0.12.0) Anthony Liguori
2009-10-15 6:36 ` Raw vs. tap (was: Re: [Qemu-devel] " Mark McLoughlin
2009-10-15 7:56 ` Raw vs. tap (was: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-10-15 13:32 ` Raw vs. tap Anthony Liguori
2009-10-15 15:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-10-15 15:18 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-10-15 15:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-10-15 18:37 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-10-15 22:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-10-18 10:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-10-15 7:51 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: Release plan for 0.12.0 Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-10-20 6:33 ` Takahiro Hirofuchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AC36F0C.8020400@us.ibm.com \
--to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
--cc=av1474@comtv.ru \
--cc=balrogg@gmail.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.