From: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com>
To: baruch@tkos.co.il, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ben-linux@fluff.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 13/16] i2c-designware: i2c_dw_xfer_msg: Introduce a local "buf" pointer
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:53:11 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD3EB97.9060406@necel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AD3E974.8080200@necel.com>
While we have "buf_len" local variable for dev->tx_buf_len, we don't
have such local variable for dev->tx_buf pointer. While "buf_len" is
restored at first then updated when we're going to process a new i2c_msg
(in WRITE_IN_PROGRESS case), ->tx_buf is never done so.
Such inconsistency makes the code slightly hard to follow.
Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com>
---
Furthermore, even with this change, i2c_dw_xfer_msg() is still
inconsistent with i2c_dw_read(). I don't have preference around
here, but would like to sort out. Any suggestions are welcome.
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c | 7 ++++---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c
index de006f0..b3152c2 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c
@@ -363,6 +363,7 @@ i2c_dw_xfer_msg(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
int rx_limit = dev->rx_fifo_depth - readl(dev->base + DW_IC_RXFLR);
u32 addr = msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].addr;
u32 buf_len = dev->tx_buf_len;
+ u8 *buf = dev->tx_buf;;
for (; dev->msg_write_idx < dev->msgs_num; dev->msg_write_idx++) {
/* if target address has changed, we need to
@@ -381,7 +382,7 @@ i2c_dw_xfer_msg(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
if (!(dev->status & STATUS_WRITE_IN_PROGRESS)) {
/* new i2c_msg */
- dev->tx_buf = msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].buf;
+ buf = msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].buf;
buf_len = msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].len;
}
@@ -390,12 +391,12 @@ i2c_dw_xfer_msg(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
writel(0x100, dev->base + DW_IC_DATA_CMD);
rx_limit--;
} else
- writel(*(dev->tx_buf++),
- dev->base + DW_IC_DATA_CMD);
+ writel(*buf++, dev->base + DW_IC_DATA_CMD);
tx_limit--; buf_len--;
}
dev->tx_buf_len = buf_len;
+ dev->tx_buf = buf;
/* more bytes to be written? */
if (buf_len > 0) {
--
1.6.5
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com (Shinya Kuribayashi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 13/16] i2c-designware: i2c_dw_xfer_msg: Introduce a local "buf" pointer
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:53:11 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD3EB97.9060406@necel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AD3E974.8080200@necel.com>
While we have "buf_len" local variable for dev->tx_buf_len, we don't
have such local variable for dev->tx_buf pointer. While "buf_len" is
restored at first then updated when we're going to process a new i2c_msg
(in WRITE_IN_PROGRESS case), ->tx_buf is never done so.
Such inconsistency makes the code slightly hard to follow.
Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com>
---
Furthermore, even with this change, i2c_dw_xfer_msg() is still
inconsistent with i2c_dw_read(). I don't have preference around
here, but would like to sort out. Any suggestions are welcome.
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c | 7 ++++---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c
index de006f0..b3152c2 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c
@@ -363,6 +363,7 @@ i2c_dw_xfer_msg(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
int rx_limit = dev->rx_fifo_depth - readl(dev->base + DW_IC_RXFLR);
u32 addr = msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].addr;
u32 buf_len = dev->tx_buf_len;
+ u8 *buf = dev->tx_buf;;
for (; dev->msg_write_idx < dev->msgs_num; dev->msg_write_idx++) {
/* if target address has changed, we need to
@@ -381,7 +382,7 @@ i2c_dw_xfer_msg(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
if (!(dev->status & STATUS_WRITE_IN_PROGRESS)) {
/* new i2c_msg */
- dev->tx_buf = msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].buf;
+ buf = msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].buf;
buf_len = msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].len;
}
@@ -390,12 +391,12 @@ i2c_dw_xfer_msg(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
writel(0x100, dev->base + DW_IC_DATA_CMD);
rx_limit--;
} else
- writel(*(dev->tx_buf++),
- dev->base + DW_IC_DATA_CMD);
+ writel(*buf++, dev->base + DW_IC_DATA_CMD);
tx_limit--; buf_len--;
}
dev->tx_buf_len = buf_len;
+ dev->tx_buf = buf;
/* more bytes to be written? */
if (buf_len > 0) {
--
1.6.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-13 2:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-13 2:44 [RFC] i2c-designware patches Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:44 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:48 ` [PATCH 01/16] i2c-designware: Consolidate to use 32-bit word accesses Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:48 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:48 ` [PATCH 02/16] i2c-designware: Don't use the IC_CLR_INTR register to clear interrupts Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:48 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:49 ` [PATCH 03/16] i2c-designware: Use platform_get_irq helper Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:49 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:49 ` [PATCH 04/16] i2c-designware: i2c_dw_read: Take "struct dw_i2c_dev" pointer Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:49 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:50 ` [PATCH 05/16] i2c-designware: i2c_dw_xfer_msg: " Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:50 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:50 ` [PATCH 06/16] i2c-designware: Remove an useless local variable "num" Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:50 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:50 ` [PATCH 07/16] i2c-designware: Set a clock name to DesignWare I2C clock source Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:50 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
[not found] ` <4AD3EB09.8050304-jaWZhaxaiAMAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-13 9:54 ` Mark Brown
2009-10-13 9:54 ` Mark Brown
2009-10-14 4:19 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-14 4:19 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 22:41 ` Ben Dooks
2009-10-13 22:41 ` Ben Dooks
2009-10-13 22:41 ` Ben Dooks
2009-10-14 4:19 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-14 4:19 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
[not found] ` <4AD5514B.4090504-jaWZhaxaiAMAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-14 10:09 ` Mark Brown
2009-10-14 10:09 ` Mark Brown
2009-10-14 19:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-14 19:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-15 3:37 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-15 3:37 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:51 ` [PATCH 08/16] i2c-designware: Improve _HCNT/_LCNT calculation Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:51 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:51 ` [PATCH 09/16] i2c-designware: i2c_dw_xfer_msg: Fix an i2c_msg search bug Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:51 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:52 ` [PATCH 10/16] i2c-designware: Do dw_i2c_pump_msg's jobs in the interrutp handler Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:52 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:52 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:52 ` [PATCH 11/16] i2c-designware: Set Tx/Rx FIFO threshold levels Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:52 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:52 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:52 ` [PATCH 12/16] i2c-designware: Divide i2c_dw_xfer_msg into two functions Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:52 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:53 ` Shinya Kuribayashi [this message]
2009-10-13 2:53 ` [PATCH 13/16] i2c-designware: i2c_dw_xfer_msg: Introduce a local "buf" pointer Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:53 ` [PATCH 14/16] i2c-designware: Deferred FIFO-data-counting variables initialization Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:53 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:53 ` [PATCH 15/16] i2c-designware: i2c_dw_xfer_msg: Mark as completed on an error Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:53 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-15 5:29 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-15 5:29 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:54 ` [PATCH 16/16] i2c-designware: Add I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_* bits Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:54 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-14 18:53 ` Baruch Siach
2009-10-14 18:53 ` Baruch Siach
2009-10-15 3:22 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-15 3:22 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 7:04 ` [RFC] i2c-designware patches Baruch Siach
2009-10-13 7:04 ` Baruch Siach
2009-10-13 8:01 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 8:01 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-14 19:02 ` Baruch Siach
2009-10-14 19:02 ` Baruch Siach
2009-10-19 1:23 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-19 1:23 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AD3EB97.9060406@necel.com \
--to=shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com \
--cc=baruch@tkos.co.il \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.