From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>, Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, mce: disable MCE if cpu has no MCE banks
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:24:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE7D59D.9070307@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AE7C396.7040109@jp.fujitsu.com>
Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
> Mike Travis wrote:
>> Mike Travis wrote:
>>> Hi Roland,
>>>
>>> I've found that I'm getting one of these lines for every cpu:
>>>
>>> mce: CPU supports 0 MCE banks
That message can be just removed I think. I don't see much value in it
because the value is in sysfs and when you see the CPU type you can easily
determine it anyways.
I don't think the patch below really solves the problem because they
would have the same noise problem back once they switch from the simulator
to a real box which has banks.
> Hum, I suppose the line for CPU 0 was slightly different from others,
> because SHD means "this bank is shared bank and controlled by other".
> Maybe:
> CPU 0 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:2 CMCI:3 CMCI:5 ... CMCI:21
>
> But I agree that we could some work for this messages...
> Is it better to change the message level to debug from info?
Can be made INFO yes, but I would prefer not removing them
from the dmesg for now.
Perhaps they could be also compressed a bit like SRAT.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-28 5:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-15 21:21 [PATCH] x86: Don't print number of MCE banks for every CPU Roland Dreier
2009-10-16 7:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-16 7:22 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Roland Dreier
2009-10-27 19:42 ` [PATCH] " Mike Travis
2009-10-27 20:53 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28 4:07 ` [PATCH] x86, mce: disable MCE if cpu has no MCE banks Hidetoshi Seto
2009-10-28 5:24 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2009-10-28 6:26 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-10-28 6:48 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28 8:18 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-10-28 17:09 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28 17:12 ` Roland Dreier
2009-10-28 17:37 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28 18:03 ` Roland Dreier
2009-10-28 12:03 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-10-28 13:44 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28 4:26 ` [PATCH] x86: Don't print number of MCE banks for every CPU Roland Dreier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AE7D59D.9070307@linux.intel.com \
--to=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.