All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, mce: disable MCE if cpu has no MCE banks
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:03:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adar5sns8f8.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AE88151.8000608@sgi.com> (Mike Travis's message of "Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:37:21 -0700")


 > > But would we want to accumulate all the different combinations of banks
 > > along with a CPU mask and then print something like:
 > >
 > >  CPUs 0 4: MCA banks CMCI:2 CMCI:3 CMCI:5 CMCI:6 SHD:8
 > >  CPUs 1 2 3 5 6 7: MCA banks CMCI:2 CMCI:3 CMCI:5 SHD:6 SHD:8
 > >  CPUs 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15: MCA banks SHD:2 SHD:3 SHD:5 SHD:6 SHD:8
 > 
 > Or use a cpumask and cpulist_scnprintf which condenses the cpu list nicely.

Thanks!  I didn't know about that API.

However with that said I think the real issue is whether that style of
output is a good idea, no matter how nicely the CPU list is formatted :)

 - R.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-28 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-15 21:21 [PATCH] x86: Don't print number of MCE banks for every CPU Roland Dreier
2009-10-16  7:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-16  7:22 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Roland Dreier
2009-10-27 19:42 ` [PATCH] " Mike Travis
2009-10-27 20:53   ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28  4:07     ` [PATCH] x86, mce: disable MCE if cpu has no MCE banks Hidetoshi Seto
2009-10-28  5:24       ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28  6:26         ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-10-28  6:48           ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28  8:18             ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-10-28 17:09               ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28 17:12             ` Roland Dreier
2009-10-28 17:37               ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28 18:03                 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2009-10-28 12:03         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-10-28 13:44           ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28  4:26     ` [PATCH] x86: Don't print number of MCE banks for every CPU Roland Dreier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adar5sns8f8.fsf@cisco.com \
    --to=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.