All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: roel.kluin@gmail.com (Roel Kluin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] IXP4xx: Ensure index is positive
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:05:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AF0A92C.6050400@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3eiofl2v8.fsf@intrepid.localdomain>

The indexes were signed, so negatives were possible.

Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
---
Op 03-11-09 22:23, Krzysztof Halasa schreef:
> Karl Hiramoto <karl@hiramoto.org> writes:

>> changing npe_request() to unsigned would probably be better

> Right. Both files in fact.
> 
> Even the id < NPE_COUNT test is probably not needed but I can imagine
> someone lowering NPE_COUNT. Negative values are unreasonable (though
> unsigned type make this unrelevant, of course).

 arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c            |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/gpio.h |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/npe.h  |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/ixp4xx_npe.c        |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Is this ok?

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c
index cfd52fb..3bbf40f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ int gpio_to_irq(int gpio)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpio_to_irq);
 
-int irq_to_gpio(int irq)
+int irq_to_gpio(unsigned int irq)
 {
 	int gpio = (irq < 32) ? irq2gpio[irq] : -EINVAL;
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/gpio.h b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/gpio.h
index cd5aec2..a5f87de 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/gpio.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/gpio.h
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static inline void gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value)
 #include <asm-generic/gpio.h>			/* cansleep wrappers */
 
 extern int gpio_to_irq(int gpio);
-extern int irq_to_gpio(int gpio);
+extern int irq_to_gpio(unsigned int irq);
 
 #endif
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/npe.h b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/npe.h
index 37d0511..e320db2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/npe.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/npe.h
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ int npe_send_message(struct npe *npe, const void *msg, const char *what);
 int npe_recv_message(struct npe *npe, void *msg, const char *what);
 int npe_send_recv_message(struct npe *npe, void *msg, const char *what);
 int npe_load_firmware(struct npe *npe, const char *name, struct device *dev);
-struct npe *npe_request(int id);
+struct npe *npe_request(unsigned id);
 void npe_release(struct npe *npe);
 
 #endif /* __IXP4XX_NPE_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/ixp4xx_npe.c b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/ixp4xx_npe.c
index 47ac69c..e8bb257 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/ixp4xx_npe.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/ixp4xx_npe.c
@@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ err:
 }
 
 
-struct npe *npe_request(int id)
+struct npe *npe_request(unsigned id)
 {
 	if (id < NPE_COUNT)
 		if (npe_tab[id].valid)

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
To: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Cc: Karl Hiramoto <karl@hiramoto.org>, Imre Kaloz <kaloz@openwrt.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IXP4xx: Ensure index is positive
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:05:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AF0A92C.6050400@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3eiofl2v8.fsf@intrepid.localdomain>

The indexes were signed, so negatives were possible.

Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
---
Op 03-11-09 22:23, Krzysztof Halasa schreef:
> Karl Hiramoto <karl@hiramoto.org> writes:

>> changing npe_request() to unsigned would probably be better

> Right. Both files in fact.
> 
> Even the id < NPE_COUNT test is probably not needed but I can imagine
> someone lowering NPE_COUNT. Negative values are unreasonable (though
> unsigned type make this unrelevant, of course).

 arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c            |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/gpio.h |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/npe.h  |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/ixp4xx_npe.c        |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Is this ok?

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c
index cfd52fb..3bbf40f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ int gpio_to_irq(int gpio)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpio_to_irq);
 
-int irq_to_gpio(int irq)
+int irq_to_gpio(unsigned int irq)
 {
 	int gpio = (irq < 32) ? irq2gpio[irq] : -EINVAL;
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/gpio.h b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/gpio.h
index cd5aec2..a5f87de 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/gpio.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/gpio.h
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static inline void gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value)
 #include <asm-generic/gpio.h>			/* cansleep wrappers */
 
 extern int gpio_to_irq(int gpio);
-extern int irq_to_gpio(int gpio);
+extern int irq_to_gpio(unsigned int irq);
 
 #endif
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/npe.h b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/npe.h
index 37d0511..e320db2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/npe.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/npe.h
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ int npe_send_message(struct npe *npe, const void *msg, const char *what);
 int npe_recv_message(struct npe *npe, void *msg, const char *what);
 int npe_send_recv_message(struct npe *npe, void *msg, const char *what);
 int npe_load_firmware(struct npe *npe, const char *name, struct device *dev);
-struct npe *npe_request(int id);
+struct npe *npe_request(unsigned id);
 void npe_release(struct npe *npe);
 
 #endif /* __IXP4XX_NPE_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/ixp4xx_npe.c b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/ixp4xx_npe.c
index 47ac69c..e8bb257 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/ixp4xx_npe.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/ixp4xx_npe.c
@@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ err:
 }
 
 
-struct npe *npe_request(int id)
+struct npe *npe_request(unsigned id)
 {
 	if (id < NPE_COUNT)
 		if (npe_tab[id].valid)

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-03 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-03 19:10 [PATCH] IXP4xx: Ensure index is positive Roel Kluin
2009-11-03 19:10 ` Roel Kluin
2009-11-03 20:27 ` Karl Hiramoto
2009-11-03 20:27   ` Karl Hiramoto
2009-11-03 21:23   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-11-03 21:23     ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-11-03 22:05     ` Roel Kluin [this message]
2009-11-03 22:05       ` Roel Kluin
2009-11-05 13:04       ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-11-05 13:04         ` Krzysztof Halasa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AF0A92C.6050400@gmail.com \
    --to=roel.kluin@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.