From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [sneak preview] major scsi overhaul
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:25:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AF888CE.4000502@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f43fc5580911091238g77ef4b4ah2a7b7684adbac0aa@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/09/09 21:38, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> As Michael notes, devices have physical address sizes independent of the
>> target platform; a PCI device that supports 64-bit addresses can be plugged
>> into a motherboard that supports 32-bit address bus processors.
>
> True. But I think the solution is not to make all buses maximum width,
> but support multiple buses with width translation in between.
I suspect translating between 32 and 64 bit is more complex and more
overhead than simply using 64bit all the time.
> We could improve the compilation system so that on 64 bit hosts the
> benefit of single size target_phys_addr_t results in compiling the
> files only once.
I think this is already the case. When building on x86_64 host (both
32bit and 64bit targets) I find the libhw32 directory empty ...
cheers,
Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-09 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-06 23:09 [Qemu-devel] [sneak preview] major scsi overhaul Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-07 15:22 ` Blue Swirl
2009-11-09 9:08 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-09 12:37 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-09 13:03 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-09 13:17 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-09 13:39 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-09 13:48 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-09 20:38 ` Blue Swirl
2009-11-09 21:25 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2009-11-11 4:06 ` Paul Brook
2009-11-11 9:41 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-11 14:13 ` Paul Brook
2009-11-11 15:26 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-11 16:38 ` Paul Brook
2009-11-16 16:35 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-16 18:53 ` Paul Brook
2009-11-16 21:50 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-24 11:59 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-24 13:51 ` Paul Brook
2009-11-25 16:37 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-26 7:31 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-11-26 8:25 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-26 10:57 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-11-26 11:04 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-26 11:20 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-11-26 14:21 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-26 14:27 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-11-26 14:37 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-26 15:50 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-11-27 11:08 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-12-02 13:47 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-12-07 8:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-12-07 8:50 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-16 19:08 ` Ryan Harper
2009-11-16 20:40 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-16 21:45 ` Ryan Harper
2009-11-11 11:21 ` [Qemu-devel] " Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-11 11:52 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-11-11 13:02 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-11 13:30 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-11-11 14:37 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-11-12 9:54 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AF888CE.4000502@redhat.com \
--to=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.