* [PATCH] Documentation: rw_lock lessons learned
@ 2009-11-10 18:23 William Allen Simpson
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: William Allen Simpson @ 2009-11-10 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Developers, Linux Kernel Network Developers
Cc: Eric Dumazet, Paul E. McKenney
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 263 bytes --]
In recent weeks, two different network projects erroneously
strayed down the rw_lock path. Update the Documentation
based upon comments in those threads.
---
Documentation/spinlocks.txt | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
[-- Attachment #2: spinlocks.txt.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 638 bytes --]
diff --git a/Documentation/spinlocks.txt b/Documentation/spinlocks.txt
index 619699d..c112052 100644
--- a/Documentation/spinlocks.txt
+++ b/Documentation/spinlocks.txt
@@ -233,4 +233,18 @@ indeed), while write-locks need to protect themselves against interrupts.
Linus
+----
+
+The implications of spin_locks on memory are further described in:
+
+ Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+ (5) LOCK operations.
+ (6) UNLOCK operations.
+
+----
+
+We are working hard to remove reader-writer spinlocks (rw_lock) from the
+network stack, so please don't add a new one. Instead, see:
+
+ Documentation/RCU/rcu.txt
--
1.6.3.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2009-11-10 18:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-10 18:23 [PATCH] Documentation: rw_lock lessons learned William Allen Simpson
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.