From: Francesco VIRLINZI <francesco.virlinzi@st.com>
To: Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>
Cc: Linux-sh <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [Proposal] [PATCH] generic clock framework
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:54:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AFA6DB9.1010307@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AF9AC3B.2070004@am.sony.com>
Hi Tim
Thanks for your feedback.
ARM mail list was already involved.
Regards
Francesco
On 11/10/2009 07:08 PM, Tim Bird wrote:
> Francesco VIRLINZI wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I'm Francesco and I work in STMicroelectronics
>>
>> In the last ELC-E_2009 I spoke on a generic clock framework I'm working on
>> (see
>> http://tree.celinuxforum.org/CelfPubWiki/ELCEurope2009Presentations?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=ELC_E_2009_Generic_Clock_Framework.pdf).
>>
>>
>> I wrote the gcf to manage both clocks the platform_devices during a
>> clock operation.
>>
> This looks good to me, in principle, but I'm not a clock or PM
> expert. I would recommend sending this to the linux-kernel and
> linux-pm lists as well. I think you'll get a wider audience for
> feedback.
> -- Tim
>
> =============================
> Tim Bird
> Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
> Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America
> =============================
>
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Francesco VIRLINZI <francesco.virlinzi@st.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [Proposal] [PATCH] generic clock framework
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:54:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AFA6DB9.1010307@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AF9AC3B.2070004@am.sony.com>
Hi Tim
Thanks for your feedback.
ARM mail list was already involved.
Regards
Francesco
On 11/10/2009 07:08 PM, Tim Bird wrote:
> Francesco VIRLINZI wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I'm Francesco and I work in STMicroelectronics
>>
>> In the last ELC-E_2009 I spoke on a generic clock framework I'm working on
>> (see
>> http://tree.celinuxforum.org/CelfPubWiki/ELCEurope2009Presentations?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=ELC_E_2009_Generic_Clock_Framework.pdf).
>>
>>
>> I wrote the gcf to manage both clocks the platform_devices during a
>> clock operation.
>>
> This looks good to me, in principle, but I'm not a clock or PM
> expert. I would recommend sending this to the linux-kernel and
> linux-pm lists as well. I think you'll get a wider audience for
> feedback.
> -- Tim
>
> ==============> Tim Bird
> Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
> Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America
> ==============>
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: francesco.virlinzi@st.com (Francesco VIRLINZI)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [Proposal] [PATCH] generic clock framework
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:54:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AFA6DB9.1010307@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AF9AC3B.2070004@am.sony.com>
Hi Tim
Thanks for your feedback.
ARM mail list was already involved.
Regards
Francesco
On 11/10/2009 07:08 PM, Tim Bird wrote:
> Francesco VIRLINZI wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I'm Francesco and I work in STMicroelectronics
>>
>> In the last ELC-E_2009 I spoke on a generic clock framework I'm working on
>> (see
>> http://tree.celinuxforum.org/CelfPubWiki/ELCEurope2009Presentations?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=ELC_E_2009_Generic_Clock_Framework.pdf).
>>
>>
>> I wrote the gcf to manage both clocks the platform_devices during a
>> clock operation.
>>
> This looks good to me, in principle, but I'm not a clock or PM
> expert. I would recommend sending this to the linux-kernel and
> linux-pm lists as well. I think you'll get a wider audience for
> feedback.
> -- Tim
>
> =============================
> Tim Bird
> Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
> Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America
> =============================
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-11 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-10 15:06 [Proposal] [PATCH] generic clock framework Francesco VIRLINZI
2009-11-10 15:06 ` Francesco VIRLINZI
2009-11-10 18:08 ` Tim Bird
2009-11-10 18:08 ` Tim Bird
2009-11-11 7:54 ` Francesco VIRLINZI [this message]
2009-11-11 7:54 ` Francesco VIRLINZI
2009-11-11 7:54 ` Francesco VIRLINZI
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-10 14:00 Francesco VIRLINZI
2009-11-10 14:00 ` Francesco VIRLINZI
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AFA6DB9.1010307@st.com \
--to=francesco.virlinzi@st.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.