From: "Éric Piel" <Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Samu Onkalo <samu.p.onkalo@nokia.com>,
daniel@caiaq.de, pavel@ucw.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 00/10] LIS3: Feature updates and
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:37:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B01B804.6070809@tremplin-utc.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091116120327.7dd04a0d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Op 16-11-09 21:03, Andrew Morton schreef:
> On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:01:34 +0100
> __ric Piel<eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net> wrote:
:
>> Andrew, maybe you could already queue the first 5 patches, as they all
>> look fine and are fixing bugs. So we are sure they are there for 2.6.33
>> :-) The rest of the patch series is useful but just "new feature" and
>> some need more work.
>
> OK, I merged the five.
>
> We could sneak some/all of them into 2.6.32 I guess, if you think
> that's warranted?
Well, if it's not too late, it would be worthy, as they are fixing bugs,
some of them actually affecting users. At least the first 4 should be
very safe.
> The ones which were From:yourself were missing Samu's Signed-off-by:.
> I added it.
Thanks
>
> "[PATCH v2 04/10] lis3: fix show rate for 8 bits chips" has a poor
> changelog. "fix with 8 bits sensors". It failed to tell us what the
> bug was, what its user-visible effects were, how it was fixed.
Yes, I actually resent it with a better changelog yesterday:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/15/91
I should have highlighted it in my previous email. Could you pick this
one instead?
Thanks,
Eric
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Éric Piel" <Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Samu Onkalo <samu.p.onkalo@nokia.com>,
daniel@caiaq.de, pavel@ucw.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] LIS3: Feature updates and corrections
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:37:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B01B804.6070809@tremplin-utc.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091116120327.7dd04a0d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Op 16-11-09 21:03, Andrew Morton schreef:
> On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:01:34 +0100
> __ric Piel<eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net> wrote:
:
>> Andrew, maybe you could already queue the first 5 patches, as they all
>> look fine and are fixing bugs. So we are sure they are there for 2.6.33
>> :-) The rest of the patch series is useful but just "new feature" and
>> some need more work.
>
> OK, I merged the five.
>
> We could sneak some/all of them into 2.6.32 I guess, if you think
> that's warranted?
Well, if it's not too late, it would be worthy, as they are fixing bugs,
some of them actually affecting users. At least the first 4 should be
very safe.
> The ones which were From:yourself were missing Samu's Signed-off-by:.
> I added it.
Thanks
>
> "[PATCH v2 04/10] lis3: fix show rate for 8 bits chips" has a poor
> changelog. "fix with 8 bits sensors". It failed to tell us what the
> bug was, what its user-visible effects were, how it was fixed.
Yes, I actually resent it with a better changelog yesterday:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/15/91
I should have highlighted it in my previous email. Could you pick this
one instead?
Thanks,
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-16 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-10 12:41 [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 00/10] LIS3: Feature updates and corrections Samu Onkalo
2009-11-10 12:41 ` Samu Onkalo
2009-11-10 12:41 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 01/10] LIS3LV02D: Send sync event Samu Onkalo
2009-11-10 12:41 ` Samu Onkalo
2009-11-10 12:41 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 02/10] LIS3LV02D: Correct memory leak in Samu Onkalo
2009-11-10 12:41 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] LIS3LV02D: Correct memory leak in module unload Samu Onkalo
2009-11-10 12:41 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 03/10] lis3: Update documentation and Samu Onkalo
2009-11-10 12:41 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] lis3: Update documentation and comments Samu Onkalo
2009-11-10 12:41 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 04/10] lis3: fix show rate for 8 bits chips Samu Onkalo
2009-11-10 12:41 ` Samu Onkalo
2009-11-10 12:41 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 05/10] LIS3LV02D: Proper power on sequence Samu Onkalo
2009-11-10 12:41 ` Samu Onkalo
2009-11-10 12:41 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 06/10] LIS3LV02D: Selftest support Samu Onkalo
2009-11-10 12:41 ` Samu Onkalo
2009-11-10 12:41 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 07/10] LIS3LV02D: Remove calibaration Samu Onkalo
2009-11-10 12:41 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] LIS3LV02D: Remove calibaration functionality Samu Onkalo
2009-11-10 12:41 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 08/10] lis3: Sysfs entry for setting chip Samu Onkalo
2009-11-10 12:41 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] lis3: Sysfs entry for setting chip measurement rate Samu Onkalo
2009-11-10 12:41 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 09/10] lis3: Scale output values to mg Samu Onkalo
2009-11-10 12:41 ` Samu Onkalo
2009-11-10 12:41 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 10/10] LIS3: Update documentation to match Samu Onkalo
2009-11-10 12:41 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] LIS3: Update documentation to match latest changes Samu Onkalo
2009-11-15 15:43 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 10/10] LIS3: Update documentation to Éric Piel
2009-11-15 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] LIS3: Update documentation to match latest changes Éric Piel
2009-11-15 15:32 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 09/10] lis3: Scale output values to mg Éric Piel
2009-11-15 15:32 ` Éric Piel
2009-11-15 18:04 ` [lm-sensors] " Pavel Machek
2009-11-15 18:04 ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-15 15:20 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 08/10] lis3: Sysfs entry for setting Éric Piel
2009-11-15 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] lis3: Sysfs entry for setting chip measurement rate Éric Piel
2009-11-15 15:54 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 07/10] LIS3LV02D: Remove calibaration Éric Piel
2009-11-15 15:54 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] LIS3LV02D: Remove calibaration functionality Éric Piel
2009-11-15 15:08 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 06/10] LIS3LV02D: Selftest support Éric Piel
2009-11-15 15:08 ` Éric Piel
2009-11-15 15:54 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 05/10] LIS3LV02D: Proper power on Éric Piel
2009-11-15 15:54 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] LIS3LV02D: Proper power on sequence Éric Piel
2009-11-15 15:53 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 04/10] lis3: fix show rate for 8 bits Éric Piel
2009-11-15 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] lis3: fix show rate for 8 bits chips Éric Piel
2009-11-15 15:49 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 02/10] LIS3LV02D: Correct memory leak in Éric Piel
2009-11-15 15:49 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] LIS3LV02D: Correct memory leak in module unload Éric Piel
2009-11-15 15:49 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 01/10] LIS3LV02D: Send sync event Éric Piel
2009-11-15 15:49 ` Éric Piel
2009-11-15 16:01 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 00/10] LIS3: Feature updates and Éric Piel
2009-11-15 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] LIS3: Feature updates and corrections Éric Piel
2009-11-16 20:03 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 00/10] LIS3: Feature updates and Andrew Morton
2009-11-16 20:03 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] LIS3: Feature updates and corrections Andrew Morton
2009-11-16 20:37 ` Éric Piel [this message]
2009-11-16 20:37 ` Éric Piel
2009-11-17 6:04 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 00/10] LIS3: Feature updates and samu.p.onkalo
2009-11-17 6:04 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] LIS3: Feature updates and corrections samu.p.onkalo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B01B804.6070809@tremplin-utc.net \
--to=eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel@caiaq.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=samu.p.onkalo@nokia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.