From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86: Limit the number of processor bootup messages
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:34:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B01C554.8040201@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091116212216.GA2221@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:
>
>> + if (cpu == 0)
>> + printk(KERN_INFO "CPU0: Thermal monitoring enabled (%s)\n",
>> + tm2 ? "TM2" : "TM1");
>
> Hm, 'cpu==0 means boot cpu' assumptions are not particularly clean.
Yes. It appears that boot_cpu_id is only defined for x86. I don't know
any other way to identify the boot cpu. (Hmm, in this case it *is* an
x86 specific function, so I'll change it.)
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>> + if (system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING) {
>> + static int current_node = -1;
>> + int node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
>> +
>> + if (node != current_node) {
>> + if (current_node > (-1))
>> + pr_cont(" Ok.\n");
>> + current_node = node;
>> + pr_info("Booting Node %3d, Processors ", node);
>> + }
>> + pr_cont(" #%d%s", cpu, cpu == (nr_cpu_ids - 1) ? " Ok.\n" : "");
>> + } else
>> +#endif
>> + pr_info("Booting Processor %d APIC 0x%x\n", cpu, apicid);
>
> preprocessor directives cutting into if/else branches in an assymetric
> way is being frowned upon. I'd also suggest to put this into a helper
> inline.
ok.
>
> Is the SYSTEM_BOOTING check there to not re-print this on CPU hotplug?
Actually you get the old style "Booting Processor" message for hotplug off/on.
newton:~ # cd /sys/devices/system/cpu
newton:/sys/devices/system/cpu # echo 0 > cpu6/online
[ 3037.593411] CPU 6 is now offline
newton:/sys/devices/system/cpu # echo 1 > cpu6/online
[ 3045.843469] Booting Processor 6 APIC 0x3
I can't test going into/out of the sleep modes, so it may be better to
summarize for those operations as well.
Thanks,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-16 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-16 21:07 [PATCH 0/6] Limit console output by suppressing repetitious messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86: Limit the number of processor bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-16 21:34 ` Mike Travis [this message]
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86: Limit the number of per cpu MCE " Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-16 21:35 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-17 7:10 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-17 17:16 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-17 18:40 ` [PATCH] x86, mce: rework output of MCE banks ownership information Mike Travis
2009-12-14 21:46 ` Mike Travis
2009-12-15 1:50 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 3/6] INIT: Limit the number of per cpu calibration bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-16 21:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 21:43 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-16 21:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 21:50 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-17 3:09 ` David Miller
2009-11-17 15:59 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-17 16:29 ` David Miller
2009-11-17 17:42 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-17 17:49 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-17 17:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-17 17:59 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-17 16:51 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:45 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 22:51 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-16 22:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] firmware: Limit the number of per cpu firmware messages during bootup Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched: Limit the number of scheduler debug messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86: Limit number of per cpu TSC sync messages Mike Travis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B01C554.8040201@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.